Literature DB >> 10366639

Differential neural responses during performance of matching and nonmatching to sample tasks at two delay intervals.

R Elliott1, R J Dolan.   

Abstract

Visual short-term memory in humans and animals is frequently assessed using delayed matching to sample (DMTS) and delayed nonmatching to sample (DNMTS) tasks across variable delay intervals. Although these tasks depend on certain common mechanisms, there are behavioral differences between them, and neuroimaging provides a means of assessing explicitly whether this is underpinned by differences at a neural level. Findings of delay-dependent deficits, after lesions in humans and animals, suggest that the neural implementation of these tasks may also critically depend on the delay interval. In this study we determined whether there were differential neural responses associated with DMTS and DNMTS tasks at two different delay intervals using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ten healthy volunteers were studied under four test conditions: DMTS and DNMTS at 5 and 15 sec delay. The main effect of DMTS compared with DNMTS across both delay intervals was associated with significant activation in bilateral head of caudate and medial orbitofrontal cortex. By contrast, DNMTS compared with DMTS was associated with significant activation in mediodorsal thalamus, bilateral lateral orbitofrontal cortex, and left premotor cortex. The main effect of short compared with long delay, across both tasks, was associated with significantly greater activity in occipital and parietal cortices. By contrast, long compared with short delay was associated with significantly greater activity in temporal and ventrolateral frontal cortices. We conclude that DMTS and DNMTS are not equivalent and furthermore that the precise neural implementation of these tasks is a dynamic function of delay interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10366639      PMCID: PMC6782647     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

1.  Ventral prefrontal cortex is not essential for working memory.

Authors:  M F Rushworth; P D Nixon; M J Eacott; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Functional modular organization of the primate prefrontal cortex for representing working memory process.

Authors:  T Sawaguchi
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-12

3.  The performance of visual tasks while segments of the inferotemporal cortex are suppressed by cold.

Authors:  J A Horel; D E Pytko-Joiner; M L Voytko; K Salsbury
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Dissociation of hippocampus and caudate nucleus memory systems by posttraining intracerebral injection of dopamine agonists.

Authors:  M G Packard; N M White
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 5.  Stimulus recognition.

Authors:  M Mishkin; E A Murray
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Medial temporal lesions in monkeys impair memory on a variety of tasks sensitive to human amnesia.

Authors:  S Zola-Morgan; L R Squire
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Frontal lobes and the temporal organization of memory.

Authors:  B Milner; M Petrides; M L Smith
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

8.  Thalamic radiodensity and cognitive performance in mild and moderate dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  H Förstl; B Sahakian
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.186

9.  The human perirhinal cortex and recognition memory.

Authors:  E A Buffalo; P J Reber; L R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  An 18FDG-PET study of cortical activation during a short-term visual memory task in humans.

Authors:  B E Swartz; E Halgren; J Fuster; M Mandelkern
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1994-04-14       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  40 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms of spatial working memory: contributions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the thalamic mediodorsal nucleus.

Authors:  Shintaro Funahashi; Kazuyoshi Takeda; Yumiko Watanabe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Delayed match to object or place: an event-related fMRI study of short-term stimulus maintenance and the role of stimulus pre-exposure.

Authors:  Karin Schon; Sule Tinaz; David C Somers; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  New knowledge derived from learned knowledge: functional-anatomic correlates of stimulus equivalence.

Authors:  Michael W Schlund; Rudolf Hoehn-Saric; Michael F Cataldo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Gamma-band activity reflects multisensory matching in working memory.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Till R Schneider; Frithjof Tandler; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Right ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices mediate adaptive decisions under ambiguity by integrating choice utility and outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Anastasia Christakou; Mick Brammer; Vincent Giampietro; Katya Rubia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Working memory for social cues recruits orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of delayed matching to sample for emotional expressions.

Authors:  Matthew L LoPresti; Karin Schon; Marisa D Tricarico; Jascha D Swisher; Kim A Celone; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Doallo; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Bootstrapping conceptual deduction using physical connection: rethinking frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  A computational model of Basal Ganglia and its role in memory retrieval in rewarded visual memory tasks.

Authors:  Julien Vitay; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.