Literature DB >> 8114111

Silent substitutions in mammalian genomes and their evolutionary implications.

G Bernardi1, D Mouchiroud, C Gautier.   

Abstract

An analysis of silent substitutions in pairwise comparisons of homologous genes from different mammals has shown that, in spite of individual fluctuations, their frequencies (which are very strongly correlated with the frequency of substitutions per synonymous site calculated according to Li et al. 1985) do not vary, on the average, with the GC levels of silent positions. This holds in the general case, in which silent positions of pairs of homologous genes share the same composition, namely in the human/other primates, human/artiodactyls, and in the mouse/rat pairs, as well as in the special cases in which the composition of silent positions are different, namely in the human/rabbit and the human/rat (or human/mouse) pairs. A slightly lower frequency found for low GC values in the human/bovine and human/pig pairs seems to be due to the specific gene samples used. These results contradict the previously claimed existence of differences in mutation rates and of mutational biases in third codon positions of coding sequences located in different isochores of mammalian genomes. They also imply that the variations in nucleotide precursor pools through the cell cycle and the differences in replication timing, or in repair efficiency, which were reported for different isochores, do not lead, as claimed, to differences in mutation rates, not in mutational biases in mammals. The differences claimed appear to be due to using small gene samples when individual fluctuations from gene to gene are relatively large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8114111     DOI: 10.1007/bf00182744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  43 in total

1.  Evidence that both G + C rich and G + C poor isochores are replicated early and late in the cell cycle.

Authors:  A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Complementary base pairing and the origin of substitution mutations.

Authors:  M D Topal; J R Fresco
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Compositional constraints and genome evolution.

Authors:  G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Variability of evolutionary rates of DNA.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause.

Authors:  S Aota; T Ikemura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-08-26       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome.

Authors:  K H Wolfe; P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The isochore patterns of mammalian genomes and their phylogenetic implications.

Authors:  G Sabeur; G Macaya; F Kadi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Directional mutation pressure, mutator mutations, and dynamics of molecular evolution.

Authors:  N Sueoka
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes.

Authors:  W H Li; C I Wu; C C Luo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  The structure and evolution of the human beta-globin gene family.

Authors:  A Efstratiadis; J W Posakony; T Maniatis; R M Lawn; C O'Connell; R A Spritz; J K DeRiel; B G Forget; S M Weissman; J L Slightom; A E Blechl; O Smithies; F E Baralle; C C Shoulders; N J Proudfoot
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  11 in total

1.  Rates of nucleotide substitution and mammalian nuclear gene evolution. Approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to different conclusions.

Authors:  J P Bielawski; K A Dunn; Z Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Nonrandom spatial distribution of synonymous substitutions in the GP63 gene from Leishmania.

Authors:  F Alvarez-Valin; J F Tort; G Bernardi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The problem of counting sites in the estimation of the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates: implications for the correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Enhanced synonymous site divergence in positively selected vertebrate antimicrobial peptide genes.

Authors:  Jacob A Tennessen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Evolutionary rates and expression level in Chlamydomonas.

Authors:  Cristina E Popescu; Tudor Borza; Joseph P Bielawski; Robert W Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Nonrandom frequency patterns of synonymous substitutions in homologous mammalian genes.

Authors:  S Cacciò; S Zoubak; G D'Onofrio; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Specific compositional patterns of synonymous positions in homologous mammalian genes.

Authors:  S Zoubak; G D'Onofrio; S Cacciò; G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Constraints on mutability in a multiallelic gene family.

Authors:  G J King; J R Lynn
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Genes on human chromosome 19 show extreme divergence from the mouse orthologs and a high GC content.

Authors:  Jose Castresana
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Frequencies of synonymous substitutions in mammals are gene-specific and correlated with frequencies of nonsynonymous substitutions.

Authors:  D Mouchiroud; C Gautier; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.