Literature DB >> 8095854

Beneficial impact of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. A randomized trial.

A Kritz1, J P Crown, R J Motzer, L M Reich, G Heller, M P Moore, N Hamilton, T J Yao, R T Heelan, J G Schneider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alone or in combination with peripheral blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells (PBP) as support for patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and assessed the adequacy of these strategies as alternatives to autologous bone marrow rescue.
METHODS: The authors studied patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who had a major response to conventional chemotherapy or had achieved a complete remission by surgical resection of all known metastases. They were treated with carboplatin 1500 mg/m2, etoposide 1200 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 5.0 g/m2. Before this high-dose chemotherapy, the patients had been randomly assigned to one of two hematopoietic support strategies: GM-CSF alone (Group 1) or GM-CSF-primed PBP and GM-CSF (Group 2). Autologous bone marrow was harvested from all patients for use only in the event of persistent pancytopenia with marrow aplasia on day 15.
RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were treated. Randomization was halted after the initial 10 patients because of the significant advantages for patients in Group 2 in comparison with those in Group 1 in regard to (1) the median number of days to absolute neutrophil count 0.5 x 10(9)/l (12 versus 21) and platelet count to 50 x 10(9)/l (13 versus 23), (2) platelet transfusions (3 versus 15.5), and (3) episodes of neutropenic sepsis (0 versus 4, respectively). One patient in Group 1 died from treatment-related complications. All patients in Group 1 required bone marrow reinfusion. No patient in Group 2 required bone marrow reinfusion, and no early mortality was observed in this group. Eight subsequent patients were treated with PBP and GM-CSF (Group 3). This group was more heavily pretreated than Groups 1 or 2 and had a slower hematologic recovery than Group 2. However, none of these patients required bone marrow reinfusion. The four patients in Group 1 that did not have early bone marrow rescue all had neutrophil counts of 0.0 on day 15. For Groups 2 and 3, the neutrophil counts on day 15 ranged from 0.3-2.1 x 10(9)/l (median, 1.9) and from 0.2-2.1 x 10(9)/l (median 0.6), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PBP plus GM-CSF accelerated hematologic recovery after this chemotherapeutic regimen compared with GM-CSF alone; there were reduced morbidity and platelet transfusion requirements. Recovery was sufficiently rapid that PBP were an acceptable alternative to autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients receiving high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8095854     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930415)71:8<2515::aid-cncr2820710814>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Pharmacoeconomic aspects in the treatment of curable and incurable cancer.

Authors:  V Jønsson; S R Clausen; M M Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Autologous peripheral blood stem cells: collection and processing.

Authors:  M Hansson; A Svensson; P Engervall
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Clinical role of GM-CSF in neutrophil recovery in relation to health care parameters.

Authors:  L S Hofstra; E G de Vries; C A Uyl-de Groot; E Vellenga
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in breast cancer.

Authors:  R O Dillman; N M Barth; S K Nayak; C DeLeon; A O'Connor; L Morrelli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  High-dose chemotherapy supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells in poor prognosis metastatic breast cancer--phase I/II study. Edinburgh Breast Group.

Authors:  D A Cameron; J Craig; H Gabra; L Lee; J MacKay; A C Parker; R C Leonard; E Anderson; T Anderson; U Chetty; M Dixon; A Hawkins; W Jack; I Kunkler; R Leonard; L Matheson; W Miller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Peripheral blood progenitor cell cycle kinetics following priming with pIXY321 in patients treated with the "ICE" regimen.

Authors:  J R Murren; A Gollerkeri; S Anderson; S Lutzker; S Del Prete; D Zelterman; L Garrison; B Smith
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

7.  Intensification of chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumours: feasibility of a 3-fold increase in dose intensity with peripheral blood progenitor cells and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  S Leyvraz; N Ketterer; L Perey; J Bauer; P Vuichard; J P Grob; P Schneider; V von Fliedner; F Lejeune; F Bachmann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  A comparative review of colony-stimulating factors.

Authors:  J Nemunaitis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.431

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.