Literature DB >> 10155669

Pharmacoeconomic aspects in the treatment of curable and incurable cancer.

V Jønsson1, S R Clausen, M M Hansen.   

Abstract

Assessments of the direct and indirect costs of cancer treatment have demonstrated the extreme complexity of these costs. Expenditure on cancer treatment is high, often reaching 3 to 6% of the gross national product in industrialised countries. In this article, we propose that the health outcomes associated with this high expenditure should be analysed in relation to concepts such as total cytoreduction (leading to disease-free survival and cure) and cytostabilisation with acceptable quality of life (in incurable cancer patients). Outcomes appear to be more variable among incurable compared with curable patients, so that cure and survival (which apply to only about 50% of all patients) are not the sole outcome parameters. For the 50% of patients in industrialised countries in whom cure is not possible, outcomes (in the form of cytostabilisation and an ongoing obligation to seek curative cytoreduction) will require further pharmacoeconomic assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155669     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199508040-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  28 in total

1.  Cost considerations in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  M H Tattersall; M L Friedlander
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  The Clinton health care plan.

Authors:  B Clinton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Therapeutic substitution: an option for cost-effective prescribing?

Authors:  S R Shulman; W Gouveia
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  The use of QALYs in health care decision making.

Authors:  G Loomes; L McKenzie
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: review and recommendations.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; P Feigl; B Metch; K A Hayden; F L Meyskens; J Crowley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-04-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Quality-of-life assessment in cancer treatment protocols: research issues in protocol development.

Authors:  C C Gotay; E L Korn; M S McCabe; T D Moore; B D Cheson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents.

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 8.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

9.  Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services. The Health Project Consortium.

Authors:  J F Fries; C E Koop; C E Beadle; P P Cooper; M J England; R F Greaves; J J Sokolov; D Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  The economics of dying. The illusion of cost savings at the end of life.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comments on economic evaluation of chemotherapy.

Authors:  S R Clausen; V Jøjnsson; M M Hansen; H Keiding; M Kjaer; B E Christensen; H Mouridsen; T Palshof; S W Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Economic Evaluation of a New Antiemetic Drug - Palonosetron versus Ondansetron : Assessment of the Drug Price Ratio in Five European Countries.

Authors:  Rosanna Tarricone; Federica Girolami
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.580

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.