Literature DB >> 7541235

Intensification of chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumours: feasibility of a 3-fold increase in dose intensity with peripheral blood progenitor cells and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

S Leyvraz1, N Ketterer, L Perey, J Bauer, P Vuichard, J P Grob, P Schneider, V von Fliedner, F Lejeune, F Bachmann.   

Abstract

Dose intensity may be an important determinant of the outcome in cancer chemotherapy, but is often limited by cumulative haematological toxicity. The availability of haematopoietic growth factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation has allowed the development of a new treatment strategy in which several courses of high-dose combination chemotherapy are administered for the treatment of solid tumours. PBPCs were mobilised before chemotherapy using 12 or 30 micrograms kg-1 day-1 G-CSF (Filgrastim) for 10 days, and were collected by 2-5 leucaphereses. The yields of mononuclear cells, colony-forming units and CD34-positive cells were similar at the two dose levels of Filgrastim, and the numbers of PBPCs were sufficient for rescue following multiple cycles of chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 2.5 g m-2 for 2 days, etoposide 300 mg m-2 for 3 days and cisplatin 50 mg m-2 for 3 days) was administered sequentially for a median of three cycles (range 1-4) to ten patients. Following the 30 evaluable cycles, the median duration of leucopenia < or = 0.5 x 10(9) l-1 and < or = 1.0 x 10(9) l-1 was 7 and 8 days respectively. The median time of thrombopenia < or = 20 x 10(9) l-1 was 6 days. There was no cumulative haematological toxicity. The duration of leucopenia, but not of thrombopenia, was inversely related to the number of reinfused CFU-GM (granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units). In the majority of patients, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity became dose limiting after three cycles of therapy. However, the average dose intensity delivered was about three times higher than in a standard regimen. The complete response rate in patients with small-cell lung cancers was 66% (95% CI 30-92%) and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13 months and 17 months respectively. These results are encouraging and should be compared, in a randomised fashion, with standard dose chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7541235      PMCID: PMC2034125          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  21 in total

1.  Rapid delivery of multiple high-dose chemotherapy courses with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and peripheral blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells.

Authors:  J Crown; C Wassherheit; T Hakes; D Fennelly; L Reich; M Moore; J Schneider; J Curtin; S C Rubin; B Reichman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-12-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The importance of dose and dose intensity in lung cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  N Murray
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  The importance of dose intensity in the outcome of chemotherapy.

Authors:  W M Hryniuk
Journal:  Important Adv Oncol       Date:  1988

4.  High-dose cyclophosphamide in small-cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R L Souhami; G Finn; W M Gregory; B G Birkhead; R Buckman; D Edwards; A H Goldstone; P G Harper; S G Spiro; J S Tobias
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Influence of schedule on alkylating agent cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  B A Teicher; S A Holden; J P Eder; T W Brann; S M Jones; E Frei
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Human bone marrow colony growth in agar-gel.

Authors:  B L Pike; W A Robinson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  High-dose induction chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D H Johnson; M J DeLeo; K R Hande; S N Wolff; J D Hainsworth; F A Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods.

Authors:  D L Longo; P L Duffey; V T DeVita; M N Wesley; S M Hubbard; R C Young
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Bone marrow reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: effect of graft size.

Authors:  E van der Wall; D J Richel; M J Holtkamp; I C Slaper-Cortenbach; C E van der Schoot; O Dalesio; W J Nooijen; J H Schornagel; S Rodenhuis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  3 in total

1.  A phase I/II study of multicyclic dose-intensive chemotherapy supported with G-CSF, or G-CSF and haematopoietic progenitor cells in whole blood, in two consecutive cohorts of patients.

Authors:  R de Wit; W H Kruit; C H Lamers; M B van 't Veer; A A Luyten; V van Beurden; M Harteveld; A S Planting; P I Schmitz; G Stoter; R L Bolhuis; J Verweij
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  A pilot study of MVP (mitomycin-C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  T F Hickish; I E Smith; M C Nicolson; S Ashley; K Priest; L Spencer; A Norman; G Middleton; M E O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  A comparative review of colony-stimulating factors.

Authors:  J Nemunaitis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.431

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.