Literature DB >> 8095581

Differences in proximal femur bone density over two centuries.

B Lees1, T Molleson, T R Arnett, J C Stevenson.   

Abstract

The incidence of osteoporotic hip fractures in northern Europe has been increasing over the past few decades faster than the rate adjusted for increased life expectancy. One important factor that determines osteoporotic fracture risk is bone density. The restoration of a London church, during which skeletal material dating from 1729 to 1852 was recovered, gave us the opportunity to compare the rate of bone loss in the femora of these samples with that of present-day women. The rate of bone loss, as judged by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, was significantly greater in modern-day women than in the women from two centuries ago, both pre-menopausally (p < 0.05) and post-menopausally (p < 0.01). The difference in bone loss in the Ward's triangle region between the Spitalfields samples and present-day women remained even when the assumed age at menopause was increased to 48 years or decreased to 42 years. The results suggest that differences in rates of bone loss over two centuries may partly account for the increasing incidence of hip fracture in modern-day women. Reasons for these differences are unclear, but one factor may be a lower degree of physical activity in present-day women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8095581     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90433-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  17 in total

Review 1.  Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

2.  Secular trends in proximal femoral fracture, Oxford record linkage study area and England 1968-86.

Authors:  J G Evans; V Seagroatt; M J Goldacre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Postmenopausal bone loss in human skeletal remains of a historical population of southeastern France.

Authors:  B Mafart; J Fulpin; P Y Chouc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Late prevention of hip fractures with hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Role and evolution of therapeutic options.

Authors:  R W Keen; T D Spector
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Gradual decline in mobility with the adoption of food production in Europe.

Authors:  Christopher B Ruff; Brigitte Holt; Markku Niskanen; Vladimir Sladek; Margit Berner; Evan Garofalo; Heather M Garvin; Martin Hora; Juho-Antti Junno; Eliska Schuplerova; Rosa Vilkama; Erin Whittey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  X-ray, CT and DXA study of bone loss on medieval remains from North-West Italy.

Authors:  Alda Borrè; Rosa Boano; Marco Di Stefano; Anna Castiglione; Giovannino Ciccone; Giovanni Carlo Isaia; Gian Luigi Panattoni; Carlo Faletti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Terrorist explosive belt attacks: specific patterns of bone traumas.

Authors:  Yann Delannoy; Tania Delabarde; Isabelle Plu; Laurence Legrand; Marc Taccoen; Antoine Tracqui; Bertrand Ludes
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts.

Authors:  Amanda R Hale; Ann H Ross
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Cooper; Z A Cole; C R Holroyd; S C Earl; N C Harvey; E M Dennison; L J Melton; S R Cummings; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.