Literature DB >> 14734434

Does universal comprehensive insurance encourage unnecessary use? Evidence from Manitoba says "no".

Noralou P Roos1, Evelyn Forget, Randy Walld, Leonard MacWilliam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many argue that "free" medical care leads to unnecessary use of health resources. Evidence suggests that user fees do discourage physician use, at least by those of low socioeconomic status. In this study, we compare health care utilization and health among socioeconomic groups to determine whether people of low socioeconomic status see physicians more than would be expected given their health status.
METHODS: We examined the use of health care services (physicians and hospitals) by residents of Winnipeg, Manitoba, in 1999. The cost of physician services was drawn directly from the claims filed, and the cost of hospital services was estimated using the Case Mix Group and Day Procedure Group methods linked to resource intensity weights and Manitoba hospital costs. We used neighbourhood indicators of socioeconomic status from the 1996 census and measured health status by examining rates of premature mortality, acute myocardial infarction, hip fracture (1995-1999) and diabetes (1999). Using these measures, we compared health status and health care use of residents living in areas with low average household incomes with those living in areas with high average household incomes. All rates were age- and sex-adjusted across the groups.
RESULTS: The province spent 44% more providing hospital and physician services to residents of Winnipeg neighbourhoods with the lowest household incomes (820 dollars/person annually v. 596 dollars/person for residents of the neighbourhoods with highest household incomes). However, expenditures were strongly related to health status. The 70% of the population on which the province spends 10% of its health care dollars scored well on all health indicators, and the 10% of the population on which 74% of the dollars are spent scored poorly. In each expenditure group, those with lower socioeconomic status had poorer health. In the highest expenditure group, those with lowest socioeconomic status had 82% higher premature mortality rates (23.0 v. 12.6 per 100,000 population) and 53% higher hip fracture rates (5.5 v. 3.6 per 100,000 population) than those with the highest socioeconomic status. Despite their poorer health, in each expenditure group, residents of the neighbourhoods with the lowest household incomes incurred physician expenditures that were similar to those of residents of wealthier neighbourhoods.
INTERPRETATION: Most people use little health care; high-cost users are a small group of very sick people drawn from all neighbourhoods and all income groups. People living in areas with low average household incomes use fewer physician services than might be expected, despite their poor health status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14734434      PMCID: PMC315526     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  22 in total

1.  Deprivation: explaining differences in mortality between Scotland and England and Wales.

Authors:  V Carstairs; R Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-07

2.  Assessing data quality: a computerized approach.

Authors:  L L Roos; S M Sharp; A Wajda
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Using administrative data for longitudinal research: comparisons with primary data collection.

Authors:  L L Roos; J P Nicol; S M Cageorge
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  The determinants of hospital utilization under a universal public insurance program in Canada.

Authors:  P Manga; R W Broyles; D E Angus
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston?

Authors:  J E Wennberg; J L Freeman; W J Culp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Women and social class: a methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada.

Authors:  C A Mustard; N P Roos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.

Authors:  S J Katz; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Comparing clinical information with claims data: some similarities and differences.

Authors:  L L Roos; S M Sharp; M M Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986.

Authors:  G Pappas; S Queen; W Hadden; G Fisher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  Universal care.

Authors:  Ross McElroy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Universal care.

Authors:  Jon Gerrard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Universal care.

Authors:  J A Chris Delaney; Jacqueline Quail
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Canadian adverse events study.

Authors:  J A Chris Delaney; Mark Palko; Andrei S P Brennan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Physician visits, hospitalizations, and socioeconomic status: ambulatory care sensitive conditions in a canadian setting.

Authors:  Leslie L Roos; Randy Walld; Julia Uhanova; Ruth Bond
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The relationship between work hours and utilization of general practitioners in four Canadian provinces.

Authors:  Deshayne B Fell; George Kephart; Lori J Curtis; Kelly Bower; Nazeem Muhajarine; Robert Reid; Leslie Roos
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Does Equity in Healthcare Use Vary across Canadian Provinces?

Authors:  Sara Allin
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-05

8.  Potential savings from reducing inequalities in health.

Authors:  Noralou P Roos; Kip Sullivan; Randy Walld; Leonard MacWilliam
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

9.  An evaluation on the effect of the copayment waiver policy for Korean hospitalized children under the age of six.

Authors:  Sook Young Kwak; Seok-Jun Yoon; In-Hwan Oh; Young-Eun Kim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Equity in health services use and intensity of use in Canada.

Authors:  Yukiko Asada; George Kephart
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.