Literature DB >> 8090392

Do providers adhere to ACOG standards? The case of prenatal care.

L M Baldwin1, T Raine, L D Jenkins, L G Hart, R Rosenblatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which obstetric providers abide by prenatal practice guidelines published by ACOG.
METHODS: The prenatal records were abstracted for low-risk patients initiating care with randomly selected urban obstetrician-gynecologists, rural obstetrician-gynecologists, urban family physicians, rural family physicians, and urban certified nurse-midwives in Washington state between September 1, 1988 and August 30, 1989. The prenatal care recorded in their medical charts was compared with the ACOG-recommended guidelines.
RESULTS: Overall, providers of all five types adhered closely to the published standards. Certified nurse-midwives recorded a standard of practice that most closely matched that recommended by ACOG. Overall, there was less complete adherence in the recording of maternal height, fetal activity after 30 weeks' gestation, and fetal presentation at or after 36 weeks' gestation. Those laboratory tests that ACOG has recommended most recently (serum alpha-fetoprotein and diabetes screening) and those not recommended for routine use were ordered less often on average by providers.
CONCLUSIONS: The cross-sectional nature of this study cannot demonstrate definitively that ACOG's guidelines have changed provider prenatal practices. However, these findings demonstrate that providers in varying specialties and geographic locations can adhere to a detailed set of clinical guidelines if they are appropriately disseminated and implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8090392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

1.  Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research.

Authors:  S Asch; S E Connor; E G Hamilton; S A Fox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prenatal hospitalization and compliance with guidelines for prenatal care.

Authors:  J S Haas; S Berman; A B Goldberg; L W Lee; E F Cook
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Obstetric care and payment source: do low-risk Medicaid women get less care?

Authors:  S Dobie; L G Hart; M Fordyce; C H Andrilla; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Rural and urban differences in physician resource use for low-risk obstetrics.

Authors:  L G Hart; S A Dobie; L M Baldwin; M J Pirani; M Fordyce; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S A Dobie; L M Baldwin; R A Rosenblatt; M A Fordyce; C H Andrilla; L G Hart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

6.  Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care.

Authors:  Bethann Mangel Pflugeisen; Jin Mou
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-07

7.  Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.

Authors:  James M Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20

8.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.

Authors:  M F MacDorman; G K Singh
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Content of First Prenatal Visits.

Authors:  J Dyer; G Latendresse; E Cole; J Coleman; E Rothwell
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.