Literature DB >> 8088294

Painfulness of needle and jet injection in children with diabetes mellitus.

U Schneider1, R Birnbacher, E Schober.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether insulin application by jet injector is less painful than by needle. Pain was scored by 41 diabetic and seven healthy volunteers after injections with both methods. Injections by jet were no less painful than those by needle but produced several local side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1994        PMID： 8088294     DOI： 10.1007/bf01983402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN： 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  5 in total

1.  Absorption kinetics of short- and intermediate-acting insulins after jet injection with Medi-Jector II.

Authors:  C M Houtzagers; P A Berntzen; H van der Stap; R J Heine; E A van der Veen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Jet injection of insulin: comparison with conventional injection by syringe and needle.

Authors:  R Worth; J Anderson; R Taylor; K G Alberti
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-09-13

3.  Jet injection of insulin vs the syringe-and-needle method.

Authors:  C Weller; M Linder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1966-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparison of plasma insulin profiles after subcutaneous administration of insulin by jet spray and conventional needle injection in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  G B Pehling; J E Gerich
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Risks of jet injection of insulin in children.

Authors:  G E Theintz; P C Sizonenko
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.183
  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Transdermal drug delivery by jet injectors: energetics of jet formation and penetration.

Authors:  Joy Schramm; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Interactions of inertial cavitation bubbles with stratum corneum lipid bilayers during low-frequency sonophoresis.

Authors:  Ahmet Tezel; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Formulations for children: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor; John F Marriott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Clinical testing results and high patient satisfaction with a new needle-free device for growth hormone in young children.

Authors:  J H Silverstein; F T Murray; T Malasanos; S Myers; S B Johnson; K Frye; M Grossman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Advances in transdermal insulin delivery.

Authors:  Yuqi Zhang; Jicheng Yu; Anna R Kahkoska; Jinqiang Wang; John B Buse; Zhen Gu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel atomized liquid needle-free transdermal delivery system.

Authors:  Yi-Huei Huang; Chieh-Shen Hu; Yi-Jhen Ke; Chiao-Hsi Chiang; Po-Da Hong; Ming-Kung Yeh
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.671

7.  Clinical Evaluation of the Needle-free Injection System VISION(®) for Growth Hormone Therapy in Children.

Authors:  Yutaka Igarashi
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2006-08-02

8.  Recent challenges in insulin delivery systems: a review.

Authors:  M M Al-Tabakha; A I Arida
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.975

9.  Dynamic mechanical interaction between injection liquid and human tissue simulant induced by needle-free injection of a highly focused microjet.

Authors:  Yuta Miyazaki; Masashi Usawa; Shuma Kawai; Jingzu Yee; Masakazu Muto; Yoshiyuki Tagawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.