Literature DB >> 12458673

Transdermal drug delivery by jet injectors: energetics of jet formation and penetration.

Joy Schramm1, Samir Mitragotri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pressure-driven jets have been used for intradermal delivery of a variety of drugs. Despite their introduction into clinical medicine, variability and occasional bruising have limited their widespread acceptance. Although numerous clinical studies of jet injectors have been reported in the literature, surprisingly little is known about the mechanisms of jet penetration into the skin. In this article, we report results of our studies aimed at determining the dependence of drug delivery on jet velocity and diameter. These studies were performed using two experimental models, porcine skin and human skin. Our rationale for using two models was to explore the possibility of using porcine skin as a model for human skin.
METHODS: Dermal penetration of jets possessing a range of diameters from 76 microm to 559 microm and a range of velocities from 80 m/s to 190 m/s was studied into human and porcine skin. Penetration was quantified using radiolabeled mannitol. Pressure and velocity of the jets were measured using a calibrated pressure transducer and high-speed photography.
RESULTS: Penetration of the jet into the skin was determined by two main parameters, jet diameter and average jet velocity. Substantial variation in jet penetration into porcine skin was observed for skin pieces obtained from different anatomic locations. For porcine skin, a parabolic dependence of jet delivery on velocity and diameter was observed. The threshold velocity is suggested to be between 80 and 100 m/s for a jet diameter of 152 microm. Above the threshold velocity, the delivery increased for velocities up to 150 m/s, after which delivery decreased with increasing velocity. At a constant velocity of 150 m/s, jet delivery exhibited a maximum at a diameter of 152 microm. Results obtained with human skin were qualitatively similar but quantitatively different. The threshold velocity for jet penetration into human skin was comparable with that in porcine skin; however, the maxima observed in jet delivery into porcine skin with respect to jet velocity was not apparent for human skin over the range of velocities explored.
CONCLUSIONS: These studies offer a quantitative analysis of jet penetration into the skin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12458673     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020753329492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  28 in total

1.  Synergistic effects of iontophoresis and jet injector pretreatment on the in-vitro skin permeation of diclofenac and angiotensin II.

Authors:  K Sugibayashi; M Kagino; S Numajiri; N Inoue; D Kobayashi; M Kimura; M Yamaguchi; Y Morimoto
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.765

2.  A comparative evaluation of the jet injection technique (hypospray) and the hypodermic needle for the parenteral administration of drugs: a controlled study.

Authors:  A H KUTSCHER; G A HYMAN; E V ZEGARELLI; J DEKIS; J D PIRO
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.378

3.  Anatomic evaluation of a jet injection instrument designed to minimize pain and inconvenience of parenteral therapy.

Authors:  F H J FIGGE; D J BARNETT
Journal:  Am Pract Dig Treat       Date:  1948-12

Review 4.  [Comments on the suitability of swine skin as a biological model for human skin].

Authors:  W Meyer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Characterization of the iontophoretic permselectivity properties of human and pig skin.

Authors:  D Marro; R H Guy; M B Delgado-Charro
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Clinical experience with jet insulin injection in diabetes mellitus therapy: a clue to the pathogenesis of lipodystrophy.

Authors:  M L Cohn; R A Hingson; J V Narduzzi; J M Seddon
Journal:  Ala J Med Sci       Date:  1974-07

7.  Studies on tissue penetration characteristics produced by jet injection.

Authors:  C R Bennett; R D Mundell; L M Monheim
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  [Administration of semisynthetic human insulin by a spray injector].

Authors:  A Consoli; F Capani; G La Nava; A Nicolucci; G P Prosperini; G Santeusanio; S Sensi
Journal:  Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper       Date:  1984-10-30

9.  Growth hormone treatment without a needle using the Preci-Jet 50 transjector.

Authors:  P Bareille; M MacSwiney; A Albanese; C De Vile; R Stanhope
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Jet-injected insulin is associated with decreased antibody production and postprandial glucose variability when compared with needle-injected insulin in gestational diabetic women.

Authors:  L Jovanovic-Peterson; S Sparks; J P Palmer; C M Peterson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  19 in total

1.  Interactions of inertial cavitation bubbles with stratum corneum lipid bilayers during low-frequency sonophoresis.

Authors:  Ahmet Tezel; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The effects of system parameters on in vivo injection performance of a needle-free injector in human volunteers.

Authors:  Lawrence Linn; Brooks Boyd; Hristo Iontchev; Toby King; Stephen J Farr
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Needle-free delivery of macromolecules across the skin by nanoliter-volume pulsed microjets.

Authors:  Anubhav Arora; Itzhak Hakim; Joy Baxter; Ruben Rathnasingham; Ravi Srinivasan; Daniel A Fletcher; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Micro-scale devices for transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Anubhav Arora; Mark R Prausnitz; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 5.  Physicochemical and formulation developability assessment for therapeutic peptide delivery--a primer.

Authors:  Annette Bak; Dennis Leung; Stephanie E Barrett; Seth Forster; Ellen C Minnihan; Andrew W Leithead; James Cunningham; Nathalie Toussaint; Louis S Crocker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Classification of diffuse light emission profiles for distinguishing skin layer penetration of a needle-free jet injection.

Authors:  Kieran A Brennan; Bryan P Ruddy; Poul M F Nielsen; Andrew J Taberner
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Challenges and opportunities in dermal/transdermal delivery.

Authors:  Kalpana S Paudel; Mikolaj Milewski; Courtney L Swadley; Nicole K Brogden; Priyanka Ghosh; Audra L Stinchcomb
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2010-07

8.  Delivery of intracavernosal therapies using needle-free injection devices.

Authors:  D O'Kane; L Gibson; J du Plessis; A Davidson; D Bolton; N Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  Dispersion profile of a needle-free jet injection depends on the interfacial property of the medium.

Authors:  Abdul Mohizin; Jung Kyung Kim
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.617

10.  Dynamic mechanical interaction between injection liquid and human tissue simulant induced by needle-free injection of a highly focused microjet.

Authors:  Yuta Miyazaki; Masashi Usawa; Shuma Kawai; Jingzu Yee; Masakazu Muto; Yoshiyuki Tagawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.