Literature DB >> 8086953

Rationale for systematic reviews.

C D Mulrow1.   

Abstract

Systematic literature reviews including meta-analyses are invaluable scientific activities. The rationale for such reviews is well established. Health care providers, researchers, and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information; they need systematic reviews to efficiently integrate existing information and provide data for rational decision making. Systematic reviews establish whether scientific findings are consistent and can be generalised across populations, settings, and treatment variations, or whether findings vary significantly by particular subsets. Meta-analyses in particular can increase power and precision of estimates of treatment effects and exposure risks. Finally, explicit methods used in systematic reviews limit bias and, hopefully, will improve reliability and accuracy of conclusions.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8086953      PMCID: PMC2541393          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis: state-of-the-science.

Authors:  K Dickersin; J A Berlin
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E M Antman; J Lau; B Kupelnick; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Meta-analysis: the fashion of summing-up evidence. Part I. Rationale and conduct.

Authors:  R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Guidelines for reading literature reviews.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Considerations for the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Summary of a panel discussion.

Authors:  J P Boissel; J Blanchard; E Panak; J C Peyrieux; H Sacks
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-09

6.  The medical review article: state of the science.

Authors:  C D Mulrow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Review articles: 2. The literature jungle.

Authors:  P P Morgan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  The Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials: developing a register of published reports of controlled trials.

Authors:  I Chalmers; J Hetherington; M Newdick; L Mutch; A Grant; M Enkin; E Enkin; K Dickersin
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-12

9.  Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings.

Authors:  H M Cooper; R Rosenthal
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Lau; E M Antman; J Jimenez-Silva; B Kupelnick; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  174 in total

Review 1.  Randomised studies of income supplementation: a lost opportunity to assess health outcomes.

Authors:  J Connor; A Rodgers; P Priest
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998.

Authors:  O Olsen; P Middleton; J Ezzo; P C Gøtzsche; V Hadhazy; A Herxheimer; J Kleijnen; H McIntosh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

Review 3.  Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review.

Authors:  E Ernst; M H Pittler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

Review 4.  Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions.

Authors:  Mark Petticrew
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

5.  Challenges in implementing a knowledge editor for the Arden Syntax: knowledge base maintenance and standardization of database linkages.

Authors:  Robert A Jenders; Balendu Dasgupta
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 6.  Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo G de Amorim; Soraya C Leal; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Evidence-based medicine and geriatric psychiatry.

Authors:  Raymond L Ownby
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; L M McAuley; L A Bero; R Grilli; A D Oxman; C Ramsay; L Vale; M Zwarenstein
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-08

Review 9.  A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Tami Day; Hannah Novak
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 10.  Cancer pain and depression: a systematic review of age-related patterns.

Authors:  Lucia Gagliese; Lynn R Gauthier; Gary Rodin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.