Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes.

Literature DB >> 12897365

Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes.

J Grimshaw¹, L M McAuley, L A Bero, R Grilli, A D Oxman, C Ramsay, L Vale, M Zwarenstein.

Abstract

Systematic reviews provide the best evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions including quality improvement strategies. The methods of systematic review of individual patient randomised trials of healthcare interventions are well developed. We discuss methodological and practice issues that need to be considered when undertaking systematic reviews of quality improvement strategies including developing a review protocol, identifying and screening evidence sources, quality assessment and data abstraction, analytical methods, reporting systematic reviews, and appraising systematic reviews. This paper builds on our experiences within the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) review group.

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 2003 PMID： 12897365 PMCID： PMC1743751 DOI： 10.1136/qhc.12.4.298

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Qual Saf Health Care ISSN： 1475-3898

13 in total

1. Getting evidence into practice: the work of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of care Group (EPOC).

Authors: G Mowatt; J M Grimshaw; D A Davis; P E Mazmanian
Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2001 Impact factor: 1.355

2. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions.

Authors: J M Grimshaw; L Shirran; R Thomas; G Mowatt; C Fraser; L Bero; R Grilli; E Harvey; A Oxman; M A O'Brien
Journal: Med Care Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.983

3. Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients.

Authors: P C Gotzsche
Journal: BMJ Date: 2000-09-09

Review 4. Changing physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work.

Authors: Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles; Anne E Walker; Ruth E Thomas
Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2002 Impact factor: 1.355

5. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.

Authors: Allan Donner; Neil Klar
Journal: Stat Med Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 2.373

6. Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials?

Authors: R Peto
Journal: Stat Med Date: 1987 Apr-May Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated.

Authors: S G Thompson
Journal: BMJ Date: 1994-11-19

8. Checklists for review articles.

Authors: A D Oxman
Journal: BMJ Date: 1994-09-10

9. Rationale for systematic reviews.

Authors: C D Mulrow
Journal: BMJ Date: 1994-09-03

10. Choosing the correct unit of analysis in Medical Care experiments.

Authors: Q E Whiting-O'Keefe; C Henke; D W Simborg
Journal: Med Care Date: 1984-12 Impact factor: 2.983

85 in total

1. Using drama to improve person-centred dementia care.

Authors: Pia C Kontos; Gail J Mitchell; Bhavnita Mistry; Bruce Ballon
Journal: Int J Older People Nurs Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.115

Review 2. A systematic review of strategies that increase the recruitment and retention of African American adults in genetic and genomic studies.

Authors: Vanessa A Johnson; Yolanda M Powell-Young; Elisa R Torres; Ida J Spruill
Journal: ABNF J Date: 2011

Review 3. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998.

Authors: Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin Eccles; Ruth Thomas; Graeme MacLennan; Craig Ramsay; Cynthia Fraser; Luke Vale
Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.128

Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes.

1. Getting evidence into practice: the work of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of care Group (EPOC).

2. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions.

3. Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients.

Review 4. Changing physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work.

5. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.

6. Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials?

Review 7. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated.

8. Checklists for review articles.

9. Rationale for systematic reviews.

10. Choosing the correct unit of analysis in Medical Care experiments.

1. Using drama to improve person-centred dementia care.

Review 2. A systematic review of strategies that increase the recruitment and retention of African American adults in genetic and genomic studies.

Review 3. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998.

Review 4. Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.

5. Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices.

6. Perfecting patient-centered care: the needs of the patient come first.

7. Models, strategies, and tools. Theory in implementing evidence-based findings into health care practice.

8. Identifying barriers and facilitators towards implementing guidelines to reduce caesarean section rates in Quebec.

Review 9. Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review.

Review 10. The need for knowledge translation in chronic pain.