Literature DB >> 1535110

A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

E M Antman1, J Lau, B Kupelnick, F Mosteller, T C Chalmers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the temporal relationship between accumulating data from randomized control trials of treatments for myocardial infarction and the recommendations of clinical experts writing review articles and textbook chapters. DATA SOURCES: (1) MEDLINE search from 1966 to present; search terms used were myocardial infarction, clinical trials, multicenter studies, double-blind method, meta-analysis, and the text word "random:"; (2) references from pertinent articles and books; and (3) all editions of English-language general medical texts and manuals and review articles on treatment of myocardial infarction. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized control trials of therapies for reducing the risk of total mortality in myocardial infarction (acute and secondary prevention). Review articles and textbook chapters dealing with the general clinical management of patients with myocardial infarction. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors read the material and recorded the results; disagreements were resolved by conference. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used the technique of cumulative meta-analysis (performing a new meta-analysis when the results of a new clinical trial are published) and compared the results with the recommendations of the experts for various treatments for myocardial infarction. Discrepancies were detected between the meta-analytic patterns of effectiveness in the randomized trials and the recommendations of reviewers. Review articles often failed to mention important advances or exhibited delays in recommending effective preventive measures. In some cases, treatments that have no effect on mortality or are potentially harmful continued to be recommended by several clinical experts.
CONCLUSIONS: Finding and analyzing all therapeutic trials in a given field has become such a difficult and specialized task that the clinical experts called on to summarize the evidence in a timely fashion need access to better databases and new statistical techniques to assist them in this important task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1535110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  232 in total

Review 1.  Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions.

Authors:  M Petticrew
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

Review 2.  Should people stretch before exercise?

Authors:  I Shrier
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-04

3.  Teaching and learning evidence based medicine skills in accident and emergency medicine.

Authors:  R D Hardern
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03

Review 4.  Evidence based case report: chlamydia infection in general practice.

Authors:  N R Hicks; M Dawes; M Fleminger; D Goldman; J Hamling; L J Hicks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

5.  Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability.

Authors:  C A Smith; P S Ganschow; B M Reilly; A T Evans; R A McNutt; A Osei; M Saquib; S Surabhi; S Yadav
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Stretching before exercise: an evidence based approach.

Authors:  I Shrier
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Evidence based policy: proceed with care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

8.  Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998.

Authors:  O Olsen; P Middleton; J Ezzo; P C Gøtzsche; V Hadhazy; A Herxheimer; J Kleijnen; H McIntosh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

9.  Cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Dinnes; J Kleijnen; M Leitner; D Thompson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

Review 10.  All great truths are iconoclastic: selective decontamination of the digestive tract moves from heresy to level 1 truth.

Authors:  Hendrick K F van Saene; Andy J Petros; Graham Ramsay; Derrick Baxby
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.