Literature DB >> 22581379

Disparate patterns of prenatal care utilization stratified by medical and psychosocial risk.

Elizabeth E Krans1, Matthew M Davis, Christie L Palladino.   

Abstract

To evaluate patterns of prenatal care utilization stratified by medical and psychosocial risk. A retrospective cohort of 786 pregnant women who subsequently delivered live births from 1999 to 2003 at the University of Michigan were classified into high medical, high psychosocial, high medical and high psychosocial (dual high risk) and low-risk pregnancies. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses assessed the association between risk and prenatal care utilization using the Kotelchuck Index. Of 786 pregnancies, 202 (25.7%) were high medical risk, 178 (22.7%) were high psychosocial risk, 227 (28.9%) were dual high risk and 179 (22.8%) were low-risk. Over 31% of dual high risk and 25% of high medical risk pregnancies received "adequate plus" prenatal care versus 10% of high psychosocial risk pregnancies. In multivariate analyses, adjusted for risk, race and insurance, high psychosocial risk pregnancies (OR = 1.69; 95% CI 1.06-2.72) were significantly more likely to receive inadequate prenatal care than care of greater intensity. Many high psychosocial risk pregnancies do not receive adequate prenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22581379     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1040-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  25 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes.

Authors:  B N Gaynes; N Gavin; S Meltzer-Brody; K N Lohr; T Swinson; G Gartlehner; S Brody; W C Miller
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)       Date:  2005-02

2.  Neonatal outcome in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Authors:  Sergio Ferrazzani; Rita Luciano; Serafina Garofalo; Vito D'Andrea; Sara De Carolis; Maria Pia De Carolis; Valentina Paolucci; Costantino Romagnoli; Alessandro Caruso
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Adequacy of prenatal care among women with psychiatric diagnoses giving birth in California in 1994 and 1995.

Authors:  R H Kelly; B H Danielsen; J M Golding; T F Anders; W M Gilbert; D F Zatzick
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity.

Authors:  L N Robins; J E Helzer; J Croughan; K S Ratcliff
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1981-04

6.  Prevalence and correlates of postpartum depression in first-time mothers.

Authors:  S B Campbell; J F Cohn
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1991-11

7.  South Carolina Partners for Preterm Birth Prevention: a regional perinatal initiative for the reduction of premature birth in a Medicaid population.

Authors:  Roger B Newman; Scott A Sullivan; M Kathryn Menard; Charles S Rittenberg; Amelia K Rowland; Jeffrey E Korte; Heather Kirby
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample.

Authors:  J K Myers; M M Weissman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Alcohol screening questionnaires in women: a critical review.

Authors:  K A Bradley; J Boyd-Wickizer; S H Powell; M L Burman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Alcohol-screening instruments for pregnant women.

Authors:  G Chang
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2001
View more
  6 in total

1.  Screening for Alcohol Use in Pregnancy: a Review of Current Practices and Perspectives.

Authors:  Danijela Dozet; Larry Burd; Svetlana Popova
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Addict       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 11.555

2.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

3.  Impact of psychosocial risk factors on prenatal care delivery: a national provider survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Nicholas M Moloci; Michelle T Housey; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12

4.  Does CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care Affect the Birth Experience of Underserved Women? A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Rhianon Liu; Maria T Chao; Ariana Jostad-Laswell; Larissa G Duncan
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-04

5.  Anatomy of Good Prenatal Care: Perspectives of Low Income African-American Women on Barriers and Facilitators to Prenatal Care.

Authors:  Mary C Mazul; Trina C Salm Ward; Emmanuel M Ngui
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-01-28

6.  Association between maternal social deprivation and prenatal care utilization: the PreCARE cohort study.

Authors:  Clémentine Gonthier; Candice Estellat; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Béatrice Blondel; Toni Alfaiate; Thomas Schmitz; Jean-François Oury; Laurent Mandelbrot; Dominique Luton; Philippe Ravaud; Elie Azria
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.