Literature DB >> 8084734

Contextual influences on interactive processing: effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty.

R D Melara1, J R Mounts.   

Abstract

Three contextual factors--(1) the discriminability of stimuli in pitch, (2) the number of stimuli differing in pitch, and (3) the uncertainty regarding which stimuli or tasks would appear--were manipulated as subjects performed speeded loudness classifications in each of six experiments. The magnitude of Garner interference and effects of congruity were used to gauge the degree of interactive processing. Enhancing pitch discriminability caused monotonic increases in interference and congruity. Stimulus-task uncertainty mediated the changes in Garner interference wrought by increased discriminability. Uncertainty also caused a surprising shift in congruity from strongly positive to strongly negative as uncertainty grew. Increasing stimulus quantity lowered interference, but had inconsistent effects on congruity. Regression analyses suggested that, collectively, these three contextual variables underlie most failures of selective attention in speeded classification.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8084734     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  Optional processes in similarity judgments.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks; K E Lesko
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

2.  The slippery context effect in psychophysics: intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

3.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

Review 4.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Hard and soft interacting dimensions: differential effects of dual context on classification.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-04

6.  Varieties of perceptual independence.

Authors:  F G Ashby; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Magnitude estimation and sensory matching.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-06

8.  Direct estimation of multidimensional tonal dissimilarity.

Authors:  T Carvellas; B Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Holistic and analytic modes of processing: the multiple determinants of perceptual analysis.

Authors:  C F Foard; D G Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-03

10.  Response competition effects in same-different judgments.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; W P O'Hara; B Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-09
View more
  13 in total

1.  Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Hyunsook Jang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-17

2.  Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Natalya Kaganovich; Courtney Driscoll-Huber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: the Stroop effect revisited.

Authors:  D Algom; A Dekel; A Pansky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-09

4.  Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov; Yoella Bereby-Meyer; Nitzan Shahar
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-25

5.  Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-03

6.  Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Garner interference is not solely driven by stimulus uncertainty.

Authors:  Devin M Burns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

8.  Force, Torque and Stiffness: Interactions in Perceptual Discrimination.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; Ralph L Hollis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.487

9.  The Stroop effect: it is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be.

Authors:  M Dishon-Berkovits; D Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

10.  Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference.

Authors:  E Ben-Artzi; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.