Literature DB >> 8073200

Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions.

K R Hess1.   

Abstract

Proportional hazards (or Cox) regression is a popular method for modelling the effects of prognostic factors on survival. Use of cubic spline functions to model time-by-covariate interactions in Cox regression allows investigation of the shape of a possible covariate-time dependence without having to specify a specific functional form. Cubic spline functions allow one to graph such time-by-covariate interactions, to test formally for the proportional hazards assumption, and also to test for non-linearity of the time-by-covariate interaction. The functions can be fitted with existing software using relatively few parameters; the regression coefficients are estimated using standard maximum likelihood methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8073200     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780131007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  59 in total

1.  A smooth test in proportional hazard survival models using local partial likelihood fitting.

Authors:  Göran Kauermann; Ursula Berger
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  The comparison of alternative smoothing methods for fitting non-linear exposure-response relationships with Cox models in a simulation study.

Authors:  Usha S Govindarajulu; Elizabeth J Malloy; Bhaswati Ganguli; Donna Spiegelman; Ellen A Eisen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Injection methamphetamine use is associated with an increased risk of attempted suicide: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Brandon D L Marshall; Sandro Galea; Evan Wood; Thomas Kerr
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Efficiency improvement in a class of survival models through model-free covariate incorporation.

Authors:  Tanya P Garcia; Yanyuan Ma; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Assessing risk in liver transplantation. Special reference to the significance of a positive cytotoxic crossmatch.

Authors:  H R Doyle; I R Marino; F Morelli; C Doria; L Aldrighetti; J McMichael; J Martell; T Gayowski; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Efficient semiparametric estimation of short-term and long-term hazard ratios with right-censored data.

Authors:  Guoqing Diao; Donglin Zeng; Song Yang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Preoperative Prognostic Prediction Nomogram in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Choi; Yun-Suhk Suh; Yunhee Choi; Jiyeon Han; Tae Han Kim; Shin-Hoo Park; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Incidence and prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: the GISSI-3 data.

Authors:  F Pizzetti; F M Turazza; M G Franzosi; S Barlera; A Ledda; A P Maggioni; L Santoro; G Tognoni
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Daily co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected adults in Africa started on combination antiretroviral therapy: an observational analysis of the DART cohort.

Authors:  A S Walker; D Ford; C F Gilks; P Munderi; F Ssali; A Reid; E Katabira; H Grosskurth; P Mugyenyi; J Hakim; J H Darbyshire; D M Gibb; A G Babiker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Flexible modeling improves assessment of prognostic value of C-reactive protein in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  B Gagnon; M Abrahamowicz; Y Xiao; M-E Beauchamp; N MacDonald; G Kasymjanova; H Kreisman; D Small
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.