Literature DB >> 15000411

A smooth test in proportional hazard survival models using local partial likelihood fitting.

Göran Kauermann1, Ursula Berger.   

Abstract

Proportional hazard models for survival data, even though popular and numerically handy, suffer from the restrictive assumption that covariate effects are constant over survival time. A number of tests have been proposed to check this assumption. This paper contributes to this area by employing local estimates allowing to fit hazard models in which covariate effects are smoothly varying with time. A formal test is derived to check for proportional hazards against smooth hazards as alternative. The test proves to possess omnibus power in that it is powerful against arbitrary but smooth alternatives. Comparative simulations and two data examples accompany the presentation. Extensions are provided to multiple covariate settings, where the focus of interest is to decide which of the covariate effects vary with time.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15000411     DOI: 10.1023/b:lida.0000012423.68151.da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  9 in total

1.  Exploring the nature of covariate effects in the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  T Hastie; R Tibshirani
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression.

Authors:  I Hertz-Picciotto; B Rockhill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Score tests for homogeneity of regression effect in the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; F Pessione
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Covariance analysis of censored survival data.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Prognostic impact of proteolytic factors (urokinase-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and cathepsins B, D, and L) in primary breast cancer reflects effects of adjuvant systemic therapy.

Authors:  N Harbeck; U Alt; U Berger; A Krüger; C Thomssen; F Jänicke; H Höfler; R E Kates; M Schmitt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Time-dependent effects of fixed covariates in Cox regression.

Authors:  P J Verweij; H C van Houwelingen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions.

Authors:  K R Hess
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Spline-based tests in survival analysis.

Authors:  R J Gray
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Invasion marker PAI-1 remains a strong prognostic factor after long-term follow-up both for primary breast cancer and following first relapse.

Authors:  N Harbeck; C Thomssen; U Berger; K Ulm; R E Kates; H Höfler; F Jänicke; H Graeff; M Schmitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.