Literature DB >> 8071984

The topological structure of connexin 26 and its distribution compared to connexin 32 in hepatic gap junctions.

J T Zhang1, B J Nicholson.   

Abstract

Of the gap junction proteins characterized to date, Cx26 is unique in that it is usually expressed in conjunction with other members of the family, typically Cx32 (liver [Nicholson et al., Nature 329:732-734, 1987], pancreas, kidney, and stomach [J.-T. Zhang, B.J. Nicholson, J. Cell Biol. 109:3391-3410, 1989]), or Cx43 (leptomeninges [D.C. Spray et al., Brain Res. 568:1-14, 1991] and pineal gland [J.C. Sáez et al., Brain Res. 568:265-275, 1991]). We have used specific antisera both to investigate the distribution of Cx32 and Cx26 in isolated liver gap junctions, and empirically establish the topological model of Cx26 suggested by its sequence and analogy to other connexins. Antipeptide antisera were prepared to four of the five hydrophilic domains which flank the four putative transmembrane spanning regions of Cx26. Antibodies to N-terminal residues 1-17 (alpha Cx26-N), to residues 101-119 in the putative cytoplasmic loop (alpha Cx26-CL), and to C-terminal residues 210-226 (alpha Cx26-C) were all specific for Cx26. An antibody to residues 166-185 between hydrophobic domains 3 and 4 of Cx32 had affinity for both Cx26 and Cx32 (alpha Cx32/26-E2). The antigenic sites Cx26-N, -CL and -C were each demonstrated to be cytoplasmically disposed, although the latter was conformationally hidden prior to partial proteolysis. The antigenic site for alpha Cx32/26-E2 was only accessible after exposure of the extracellular face by separation of the junctional membranes in 8 M urea, pH 12.3. This treatment also served to reveal the region between residues 45 and 66 to Asp-N protease. The topology thus demonstrated for Cx26 is consistent with that deduced for other connexins (i.e., Cx32 and Cx43). Comparison of immunogold decorated gap junctions reacted with antibodies specific to Cx26 (alpha Cx26-N and -CL), or to Cx32 [alpha Cx32-CL], indicates that these connexins do not aggregate in subdomains within a junction, at least within the resolution provided by the labeling density (one antibody per 15-22 connexons). Although the presence of both connexins within a single channel could not be distinguished, possible interactions between channels is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8071984     DOI: 10.1007/bf00232671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Membr Biol        ISSN: 0022-2631            Impact factor:   1.843


  46 in total

1.  Pinealocytes in rats: connexin identification and increase in coupling caused by norepinephrine.

Authors:  J C Sáez; V M Berthoud; R Kadle; O Traub; B J Nicholson; M V Bennett; R Dermietzel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Physiological roles of permeable junctions: some possibilities.

Authors:  J D Sheridan; M M Atkinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 19.318

3.  The cardiac gap junction protein (Mr 47,000) has a tissue-specific cytoplasmic domain of Mr 17,000 at its carboxy-terminus.

Authors:  C K Manjunath; B J Nicholson; D Teplow; L Hood; E Page; J P Revel
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1987-01-15       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Evidence that the M2 membrane-spanning region lines the ion channel pore of the nicotinic receptor.

Authors:  R J Leonard; C G Labarca; P Charnet; N Davidson; H A Lester
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  The nature of electrical propagation in cardiac muscle.

Authors:  M S Spach; J M Kootsey
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-01

Review 6.  Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel.

Authors:  W R Loewenstein
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  J Finer-Moore; R M Stroud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Gap junctional communication.

Authors:  E L Hertzberg; T S Lawrence; N B Gilula
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 19.318

9.  Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat liver gap junction protein.

Authors:  D L Paul
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Differential regulation of the levels of three gap junction mRNAs in Xenopus embryos.

Authors:  R L Gimlich; N M Kumar; N B Gilula
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  21 in total

1.  Different ionic selectivities for connexins 26 and 32 produce rectifying gap junction channels.

Authors:  T M Suchyna; J M Nitsche; M Chilton; A L Harris; R D Veenstra; B J Nicholson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Conformational changes in surface structures of isolated connexin 26 gap junctions.

Authors:  Daniel J Müller; Galen M Hand; Andreas Engel; Gina E Sosinsky
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Voltage-dependent conformational changes in connexin channels.

Authors:  Thaddeus A Bargiello; Qingxiu Tang; Seunghoon Oh; Taekyung Kwon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-24

Review 4.  Structure of the gap junction channel and its implications for its biological functions.

Authors:  Shoji Maeda; Tomitake Tsukihara
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Life cycle of connexins in health and disease.

Authors:  Dale W Laird
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Membrane integration of in vitro-translated gap junctional proteins: co- and post-translational mechanisms.

Authors:  J T Zhang; M Chen; C I Foote; B J Nicholson
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 7.  Structural organization of intercellular channels II. Amino terminal domain of the connexins: sequence, functional roles, and structure.

Authors:  Eric C Beyer; Gregory M Lipkind; John W Kyle; Viviana M Berthoud
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-10-20

8.  Preparation, characterization, and structure of half gap junctional layers split with urea and EGTA.

Authors:  S Ghoshroy; D A Goodenough; G E Sosinsky
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  Post-translational integration and oligomerization of connexin 26 in plasma membranes and evidence of formation of membrane pores: implications for the assembly of gap junctions.

Authors:  Shoeb Ahmad; W Howard Evans
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Intramolecular interactions mediate pH regulation of connexin43 channels.

Authors:  G E Morley; S M Taffet; M Delmar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.