Literature DB >> 28564430

RETROTRANSPOSON MYS IS CONCENTRATED ON THE SEX CHROMOSOMES: IMPLICATIONS FOR COPY NUMBER CONTAINMENT.

Robert J Baker1, Holly A Wichman2.   

Abstract

Chromosomal distribution of the mys retrotransposon was examined by in situ hybridization with a biotinylated probe. Thirty-six mice from four species of the Peromyscus leucopus/maniculatus complex were examined. Mys hybridized to every chromosome in all individuals examined. However, the pattern of hybridization was nonrandom. Mys elements were excluded from C-banding regions of the autosomes, and hybridized preferentially to G-bands. The most prominent feature of these hybridizations was the preferential accumulation of mys on the X and Y chromosomes of all four species examined. Accumulation of mys on the X is incompatible with the hypothesis that selection acting on deleterious mutations is the major mechanism regulating the copy number of this element. Rather, this supports the Langley model for containment of transposable element copy number by unequal exchange during meiosis. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 28564430     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04313.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  20 in total

Review 1.  Transposable elements and the evolution of genome organization in mammals.

Authors:  H A Wichman; R A Van den Bussche; M J Hamilton; R J Baker
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Population genetics of transposable DNA elements. A Drosophila point of view.

Authors:  C Biémont
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  The evolution of coexisting highly divergent LINE-1 subfamilies within the rodent genus Peromyscus.

Authors:  D H Kass; F G Berger; W D Dawson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The distribution of L1 and Alu retroelements in relation to GC content on human sex chromosomes is consistent with the ectopic recombination model.

Authors:  György Abrusán; Hans-Jürgen Krambeck
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Chromosomal location of rDNA in Allium: in situ hybridization using biotin- and fluorescein-labelled probe.

Authors:  A Ricroch; E B Peffley; R J Baker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Centromeric enrichment of LINE-1 retrotransposons and its significance for the chromosome evolution of Phyllostomid bats.

Authors:  Cibele Gomes de Sotero-Caio; Diogo Cavalcanti Cabral-de-Mello; Merilane da Silva Calixto; Guilherme Targino Valente; Cesar Martins; Vilma Loreto; Maria José de Souza; Neide Santos
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Genome organization of repetitive elements in the rodent, Peromyscus leucopus.

Authors:  L L Janecek; J L Longmire; H A Wichman; R J Baker
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Susceptibility of heterochromatin to aphidicolin-induced chromosomal breakage.

Authors:  A M Dominguez; S A Smith; I F Greenbaum
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Utility of chromosomal position of heterochromatin as a biomarker of radiation-induced genetic damage: a study of Chornobyl voles (Microtus sp.).

Authors:  Lara E Wiggins; Ronald A Van Den Bussche; Meredith J Hamilton; Ronald K Chesser; Robert J Baker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  X chromosome inactivation and Xist evolution in a rodent lacking LINE-1 activity.

Authors:  Michael A Cantrell; Bryan C Carstens; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.