Literature DB >> 8069281

Object continuity in apparent motion and attention.

S Yantis1, B S Gibson.   

Abstract

Recent theories of attention have emphasized the role of object-based representations in visual selection. One defining property of any object is spatiotemporal continuity. The present experiments show that the continuity property may underlie two seemingly unrelated perceptual phenomena: attentional capture by abrupt visual onset and the appearance of bistable apparent motion displays. In Experiment 1, observers carried out two visual tasks. In the first task, they reported the appearance of a bistable apparent-motion (or Ternus) display. Whether group or element motion was perceived depended on the duration of the blank interval between successive frames. In the second task, subjects engaged in visual search for a prespecified target, and one each trial one element was briefly flickered off and back on. The degree to which that element captured attention also depended on the duration of the temporal gap. The time course of the gap duration effect in the visual search task was very similar to that for the Ternus display. In Experiment 2, we ruled out the possibility that the presence of an abrupt offset caused the results of Experiment 1. It is argued that the apparent motion and attentional capture phenomena examined here may reflect the operation of the same underlying mechanism: in both cases, a sufficiently long temporal gap disrupts spatiotemporal continuity, thereby fundamentally changing the perceived organization of the display.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8069281     DOI: 10.1037/1196-1961.48.2.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  10 in total

Review 1.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: evidence from the "top-up" procedure.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

3.  New objects can capture attention without a unique luminance transient.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; Jason W Suszko; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

4.  Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays.

Authors:  H J Müller; A von Mühlenen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

5.  Motion onset does not capture attention when subsequent motion is "smooth".

Authors:  Meera Mary Sunny; Adrian von Mühlenen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

6.  Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.

Authors:  J F Juola; H Koshino; C B Warner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

7.  New objects do not capture attention without a sensory transient.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Daniel J Simons; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The oculomotor salience of flicker, apparent motion and continuous motion in saccade trajectories.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Benedetta Heimler; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effect of flanking sounds on the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Maori Kobayashi; Makio Kashino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Limits to the usability of iconic memory.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.