Literature DB >> 32747120

Novel bicuspid aortic valve model with aortic regurgitation for hemodynamic status analysis using an ex vivo simulator.

Yuanjia Zhu1, Annabel M Imbrie-Moore2, Michael J Paulsen3, Bryant Priromprintr4, Hanjay Wang3, Haley J Lucian3, Justin M Farry3, Y Joseph Woo5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to design and evaluate a clinically relevant, novel ex vivo bicuspid aortic valve model that mimics the most common human phenotype with associated aortic regurgitation.
METHODS: Three bovine aortic valves were mounted asymmetrically in a previously validated 3-dimensional-printed left heart simulator. The non-right commissure and the non-left commissure were both shifted slightly toward the left-right commissure, and the left and right coronary cusps were sewn together. The left-right commissure was then detached and reimplanted 10 mm lower than its native height. Free margin shortening was used for valve repair. Hemodynamic status, high-speed videography, and echocardiography data were collected before and after the repair.
RESULTS: The bicuspid aortic valve model was successfully produced and repaired. High-speed videography confirmed prolapse of the fused cusp of the baseline bicuspid aortic valve models in diastole. Hemodynamic and pressure data confirmed accurate simulation of diseased conditions with aortic regurgitation and the subsequent repair. Regurgitant fraction postrepair was significantly reduced compared with that at baseline (14.5 ± 4.4% vs 28.6% ± 3.4%; P = .037). There was no change in peak velocity, peak gradient, or mean gradient across the valve pre- versus postrepair: 293.3 ± 18.3 cm/sec versus 325.3 ± 58.2 cm/sec (P = .29), 34.3 ± 4.2 mm Hg versus 43.3 ± 15.4 mm Hg (P = .30), and 11 ± 1 mm Hg versus 9.3 ± 2.5 mm Hg (P = .34), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: An ex vivo bicuspid aortic valve model was designed that recapitulated the most common human phenotype with aortic regurgitation. These valves were successfully repaired, validating its potential for evaluating valve hemodynamics and optimizing surgical repair for bicuspid aortic valves.
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic regurgitation; bicuspid aortic valve; ex vivo; model

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32747120      PMCID: PMC7769867          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  36 in total

Review 1.  Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency: a review.

Authors:  John Prodromo; Giuseppe D'Ancona; Andrea Amaducci; Michele Pilato
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Valve sparing-root replacement with the reimplantation technique to increase the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Laurent de Kerchove; Munir Boodhwani; David Glineur; Michel Vandyck; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Philippe Noirhomme; Gebrine El Khoury
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Greater asymmetric wall shear stress in Sievers' type 1/LR compared with 0/LAT bicuspid aortic valves after valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas A Hope; Fabian A Kari; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; David H Liang; Robert J Herfkens; D Craig Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Aortic valve repair update.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Komiya
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-05

5.  Modeling conduit choice for valve-sparing aortic root replacement on biomechanics with a 3-dimensional-printed heart simulator.

Authors:  Michael J Paulsen; Patpilai Kasinpila; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Hanjay Wang; Camille E Hironaka; Tiffany K Koyano; Robyn Fong; Peter Chiu; Andrew B Goldstone; Amanda N Steele; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Michael Ma; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Effect of Geometry on the Leaflet Stresses in Simulated Models of Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Paul N Jermihov; Lu Jia; Michael S Sacks; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Krishnan B Chandran
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.495

7.  A novel 3D-Printed preferential posterior mitral annular dilation device delineates regurgitation onset threshold in an ex vivo heart simulator.

Authors:  Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Cole C Paullin; Michael J Paulsen; Frederick Grady; Hanjay Wang; Camille E Hironaka; Justin M Farry; Haley J Lucian; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 8.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Samuel C Siu; Candice K Silversides
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Bicuspid aortic valve repair by complete conversion from "raphe'd" (type 1) to "symmetric" (type 0) morphology.

Authors:  Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Comparison of Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty for aortic valve repair-a porcine study.

Authors:  Leila Louise Benhassen; Diana Mathilde Ropcke; Mona Sharghbin; Troels Lading; Jens Kæstel Skov; Marcell Juan Tjørnild; Karen Bagger Poulsen; Tommy Bechsgaard; Søren Nielsen Skov; Sten Lyager Nielsen; John Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Ex vivo biomechanical analysis of the Ross procedure using the modified inclusion technique in a 3-dimensionally printed left heart simulator.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Matthew H Park; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Robert J Wilkerson; Sarah Madira; Danielle M Mullis; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  A soft robotic sleeve mimicking the haemodynamics and biomechanics of left ventricular pressure overload and aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Luca Rosalia; Caglar Ozturk; Jaume Coll-Font; Yiling Fan; Yasufumi Nagata; Manisha Singh; Debkalpa Goswami; Adam Mauskapf; Shi Chen; Robert A Eder; Efrat M Goffer; Jo H Kim; Salva Yurista; Benjamin P Bonner; Anna N Foster; Robert A Levine; Elazer R Edelman; Marcello Panagia; Jose L Guerrero; Ellen T Roche; Christopher T Nguyen
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 29.234

3.  A Novel Device for Intraoperative Direct Visualization of a Pressurized Root in Aortic Valve Repair.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Michael J Paulsen; Matthew H Park; Nicholas A Tran; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.102

4.  Biomechanical engineering comparison of four leaflet repair techniques for mitral regurgitation using a novel 3-dimensional-printed left heart simulator.

Authors:  Michael J Paulsen; Mateo Marin Cuartas; Annabel Imbrie-Moore; Hanjay Wang; Robert Wilkerson; Justin Farry; Yuanjia Zhu; Michael Ma; John W MacArthur; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-07

5.  Biomechanical engineering analysis of an acute papillary muscle rupture disease model using an innovative 3D-printed left heart simulator.

Authors:  Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Matthew H Park; Robert J Wilkerson; Matthew Leipzig; Pearly K Pandya; Michael J Paulsen; Michael A Borger; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 6.  Heart Valve Biomechanics: The Frontiers of Modeling Modalities and the Expansive Capabilities of Ex Vivo Heart Simulation.

Authors:  Matthew H Park; Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Hanjay Wang; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Michael J Paulsen; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.