Literature DB >> 8064875

High rates of nucleotide substitution in nuclear small-subunit (18S) rDNA from holoparasitic flowering plants.

D L Nickrent1, E M Starr.   

Abstract

Relative rate tests, using Gnetum as a reference taxon, were conducted on nuclear 18S rRNA sequences from 10 angiosperms including autotrophic nonparasites (Arabidopsis, Asarum, Glycine, Malpighia, and Zea), a chlorophyllous hemiparasite (Arceuthobium--Viscaceae), and achlorophyllous holoparasites (Balanophora--Balanophoraceae, Prosopanche--Hydnoraceae, and Rafflesia and Rhizanthes--Rafflesiaceae). Compared with Glycine, the mean number of substitutions per site (K) for five autotrophic angiosperms is 0.036 whereas for the holoparasites K = 0.126, i.e., 3.5 times higher. Comparisons of autotrophic species with short and long generation times showed no differences in K; hence, divergent rRNA sequences in the holoparasites are likely attributable to other mechanisms. These might include genetic bottlenecks, effective population size, and/or molecular drive. High substitution rates appear to be associated only with those parasitic angiosperms that have developed a highly modified haustorial system and extreme nutritional dependence upon the host. At present, high substitution rates in these parasites confound attempts to determine their phylogenetic position relative to other angiosperms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8064875     DOI: 10.1007/bf00178250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  35 in total

1.  Extensive variation in evolutionary rate of rbcL gene sequences among seed plants.

Authors:  J Bousquet; S H Strauss; A H Doerksen; R A Price
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Complementary base pairing and the origin of substitution mutations.

Authors:  M D Topal; J R Fresco
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Simultaneous editing of multiple nucleic acid and protein sequences with ESEE.

Authors:  E L Cabot; A T Beckenbach
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1989-07

4.  Nucleotide sequence of the 18S rRNA gene from Arabidopsis thaliana Co10.

Authors:  I Unfried; U Stocker; P Gruendler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Construction of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  W M Fitch; E Margoliash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Molecular evolutionary clock and the neutral theory.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Reconstructing evolution from eukaryotic small-ribosomal-subunit RNA sequences: calibration of the molecular clock.

Authors:  Y Van de Peer; J M Neefs; P De Rijk; R De Wachter
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  From field to film: rapid sequencing methods for field-collected plant species.

Authors:  D L Nickrent
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.993

10.  Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution.

Authors:  V A Albert; S E Williams; M W Chase
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Examining rates and patterns of nucleotide substitution in plants.

Authors:  S V Muse
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Mitochondrial DNA sequences reveal the photosynthetic relatives of Rafflesia, the world's largest flower.

Authors:  Todd J Barkman; Seok-Hong Lim; Kamarudin Mat Salleh; Jamili Nais
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multiple independent losses of photosynthesis and differing evolutionary rates in the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae): combined phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences of the nuclear and the nucleomorph ribosomal operons.

Authors:  Kerstin Hoef-Emden
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Phylogenetic analyses of Malpighiales using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences, with particular reference to the embryology of Euphorbiaceae sens. str.

Authors:  Toru Tokuoka; Hiroshi Tobe
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL.

Authors:  B S Gaut; B R Morton; B C McCaig; M T Clegg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolution of plastid gene rps2 in a lineage of hemiparasitic and holoparasitic plants: many losses of photosynthesis and complex patterns of rate variation.

Authors:  C W dePamphilis; N D Young; A D Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Do nonasterid holoparasitic flowering plants have plastid genomes?

Authors:  D L Nickrent; Y Ouyang; R J Duff; C W dePamphilis
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Structural analyses of plastid-derived 16S rRNAs in holoparasitic angiosperms.

Authors:  D L Nickrent; R J Duff; D A Konings
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Comparing patterns of nucleotide substitution rates among chloroplast loci using the relative ratio test.

Authors:  S V Muse; B S Gaut
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Understanding the evolution of holoparasitic plants: the complete plastid genome of the holoparasite Cytinus hypocistis (Cytinaceae).

Authors:  Cristina Roquet; Éric Coissac; Corinne Cruaud; Martí Boleda; Frédéric Boyer; Adriana Alberti; Ludovic Gielly; Pierre Taberlet; Wilfried Thuiller; Jérémie Van Es; Sébastien Lavergne
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.