Literature DB >> 8816790

Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL.

B S Gaut1, B R Morton, B C McCaig, M T Clegg.   

Abstract

A number of studies have noted that nucleotide substitution rates at the chloroplast-encoded rbcL locus violate the molecular clock principle. Substitution rate variation at this plastid gene is particularly pronounced between palms and grasses; for example, a previous study estimated that substitution rates in rbcL sequences are approximately 5-fold faster in grasses than in palms. To determine whether a proportionate change in substitution rates also occurs in plant nuclear genes, we characterized nucleotide substitution rates in palm and grass sequences for the nuclear gene Adh. In this article, we report that palm sequences evolve at a rate of 2.61 x 10(-9) substitution per synonymous site per year, a rate which is slower than most plant nuclear genes. Grass Adh sequences evolve approximately 2.5-fold faster than palms at synonymous sites. Thus, synonymous rates in nuclear Adh genes show a marked decrease in palms relative to grasses, paralleling the pattern found at the plastid rbcL locus. This shared pattern indicates that synonymous rates are correlated between a nuclear and a plastid gene. Remarkably, nonsynonymous rates do not show this correlation. Nonsynonymous rates vary between two duplicated grass Adh loci, and nonsynonymous rates at the palm Adh locus are not markedly reduced relative to grasses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8816790      PMCID: PMC38374          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  The molecular evolution of the small heat-shock proteins in plants.

Authors:  E R Waters
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rates of nucleotide substitution in primates and rodents and the generation-time effect hypothesis.

Authors:  W H Li; D L Ellsworth; J Krushkal; B H Chang; D Hewett-Emmett
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  The molecular clock runs more slowly in man than in apes and monkeys.

Authors:  W H Li; M Tanimura
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Mar 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons.

Authors:  T Ota; M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock.

Authors:  A P Martin; S R Palumbi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pattern of nucleotide substitutions in growth hormone-prolactin gene family: a paradigm for evolution by gene duplication.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome.

Authors:  S V Muse; B S Gaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Mammalian gene evolution: nucleotide sequence divergence between mouse and rat.

Authors:  K H Wolfe; P M Sharp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  High rates of nucleotide substitution in nuclear small-subunit (18S) rDNA from holoparasitic flowering plants.

Authors:  D L Nickrent; E M Starr
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  293 in total

1.  Retrotransposon BARE-1 and Its Role in Genome Evolution in the Genus Hordeum.

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Evolution of genes and taxa: a primer.

Authors:  J J Doyle; B S Gaut
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize.

Authors:  B S Gaut; J F Doebley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Copy number lability and evolutionary dynamics of the Adh gene family in diploid and tetraploid cotton (Gossypium).

Authors:  R L Small; J F Wendel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Different types and rates of genome evolution detected by comparative sequence analysis of orthologous segments from four cereal genomes.

Authors:  Wusirika Ramakrishna; Jorge Dubcovsky; Yong-Jin Park; Carlos Busso; John Emberton; Phillip SanMiguel; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The evolution of plant nuclear genes.

Authors:  M T Clegg; M P Cummings; M L Durbin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Conserved noncoding sequences among cultivated cereal genomes identify candidate regulatory sequence elements and patterns of promoter evolution.

Authors:  Hena Guo; Stephen P Moose
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight glutenin loci of the A and Am genomes of wheat.

Authors:  Thomas Wicker; Nabila Yahiaoui; Romain Guyot; Edith Schlagenhauf; Zhong-Da Liu; Jorge Dubcovsky; Beat Keller
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids.

Authors:  Klaas Vandepoele; Cedric Simillion; Yves Van de Peer
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Chloroplast DNA insertions into the nuclear genome of rice: the genes, sites and ages of insertion involved.

Authors:  Xingyi Guo; Songlin Ruan; Weiming Hu; Daguang Cai; Longjiang Fan
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 3.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.