Literature DB >> 8064209

Effects of social context, reinforcer probability, and reinforcer magnitude on humans' choices to compete or not to compete.

D M Dougherty1, D R Cherek.   

Abstract

In the first two experiments, subjects' choices to earn points (exchangeable for money) either by competing with a fictitious opponent or by not competing were studied. Buskist, Barry, Morgan, and Rossi's (1984) competitive fixed-interval schedule was modified to include a second response option, a noncompetitive fixed-interval schedule. After choosing to enter either option, the opportunity for reinforcers became available after the fixed-interval's duration had elapsed. Under the no-competition condition, points were always available after the interval had elapsed. Under the competition condition, points were available based on a predetermined probability of delivery. Experiments 1 and 2 examined how reinforcer probabilities and reinforcer magnitudes affected subjects' choices to compete. Several general conclusions can be made about the results: (a) Strong preferences to compete were observed at high and moderate reinforcer probabilities; (b) competing was observed even at very low reinforcer probabilities; (c) response rates were always higher in the competition component than in the no-competition component; and (d) response rates and choices to compete were insensitive to reinforcer-magnitude manipulations. In Experiment 3, the social context of this choice schedule was removed to determine whether the high levels of competing observed in the first two experiments were due to a response preference engendered by the social context provided by the experimenters through instructions. In contrast to the first two experiments, these subjects preferred the 60-s fixed-interval schedule (formerly the no-competition option), indicating that the instructions themselves were responsible for the preference to compete. This choice paradigm may be useful to future researchers interested in the effects of other independent variables (e.g., drugs, social context, instructions) on competitive behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8064209      PMCID: PMC1334371          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Switching from competition to sharing or cooperation at large response requirements: competition requires more responding.

Authors:  D F Hake; D Olvera; J C Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies.

Authors:  B A Matthews; E Shimoff; A C Catania; T Sagvolden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some conditions affecting the choice to cooperate or compete.

Authors:  D R Schmitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Controlling human fixed-interval performance.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Producing a change from competition to sharing: effects of large and adjusting response requirements.

Authors:  D R Olvera; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Interpersonal relations: Cooperation and competition.

Authors:  D R Schmitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effects of alcohol on free-operant aggressive behavior.

Authors:  T H Kelly; D R Cherek
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  1993-09

10.  CONDITIONING HISTORY AND HUMAN FIXED-INTERVAL PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  H WEINER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Religious behaviors as strategies for organizing groups of people: A social contingency analysis.

Authors:  B Guerin
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1998
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.