Literature DB >> 16812396

Interpersonal relations: Cooperation and competition.

D R Schmitt.   

Abstract

Social relations between two persons require that consequences each receives depend at least in part on the responses of the other. Historically, research in several areas has focused on two contingencies, cooperation and competition, in which reinforcement is determined by the responses of both participants. A major research question in social psychology and applied behavior analysis has been: Which contingency is more effective with regard to the quantity or quality of some response? Although this question has not been addressed in the experimental analysis of behavior, this area provides a perspective and method to more fully investigate the relevant controlling variables. Among these are the frequency of opportunities to audit the performances of others, information (or lack of it) provided by social or nonsocial stimuli with regard to reinforcement and performance, degree of face-to-face interaction, types of reinforcement contingencies, and number of participants. A neglected dependent variable is cost effectiveness-amount of behavior maintained by a given reinforcer amount. The larger agenda for the experimental analysis of interpersonal relations includes a variety of forms of reinforcement interdependence that raise issues of basic and applied interest.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812396      PMCID: PMC1348109          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Magnitudes of score differences produced within sessions in a cooperative exchange procedure.

Authors:  B A Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Some conditions affecting the choice to cooperate or compete.

Authors:  D R Schmitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of the difference between self and coactor scores upon the audit responses that allow access to these scores.

Authors:  R Vukelich; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Audit responses: responses maintained by access to existing self or coactor scores during non-social, parallel work, and cooperation procedures.

Authors:  D F Hake; R Vukelich; S J Kaplan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A classification and review of cooperation procedures.

Authors:  D F Hake; R Vukelich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies.

Authors:  L Litoe; D K Pumroy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975

Review 7.  The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: a review.

Authors:  L A Hayes
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies.

Authors:  C F Bond; L J Titus
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Procedural variations in group contingencies: effects on children's academic and social behaviors.

Authors:  M L Speltz; J W Shimamura; W T McReynolds
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1982

10.  Effects of team arrangement on team performance: a learning-theoretic analysis.

Authors:  K Egerman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1966-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Competition: Some behavioral issues.

Authors:  D R Schmitt
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1986

2.  Interpersonal contingencies: Performance differences and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  D R Schmitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The basic importance of applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  W F Epling; W D Pierce
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1986

4.  Interpersonal and Group Contingencies.

Authors:  Tom Cariveau; Colin S Muething; Whitney Trapp
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-02-18

5.  Effects of social context, reinforcer probability, and reinforcer magnitude on humans' choices to compete or not to compete.

Authors:  D M Dougherty; D R Cherek
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Relations between Description and Experimentation in the Metacontingency Enterprise: An Interbehavioral Analysis.

Authors:  Will Fleming; Linda J Hayes
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-19

7.  Human aggressive responses maintained by avoidance or escape from point loss.

Authors:  D R Cherek; R Spiga; J L Steinberg; T H Kelly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.