Literature DB >> 8063861

Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension.

R B Nicklas1, S C Ward.   

Abstract

The correction of certain errors in mitosis requires capture and release: new kinetochore microtubules must be captured and old, misdirected ones must be released. We studied capture and release in living grasshopper spermatocytes. Capture is remarkably efficient over a broad range in the angle at which a microtubule encounters a kinetochore. However, capture is inefficient when kinetochores point directly away from the source of properly directed microtubules. Capture in that situation is required for correction of the most common error; microtubule-kinetochore encounters are improbable and capture occurs only once every 8 min, on average. Release from the improper attachment caused by misdirected microtubules allows kinetochore movement and the completion of error correction. We tugged on kinetochores with a micromanipulation needle and found they are free to move less than one time in two. Thus error correction depends on two improbable events, capture and release, and they must happen by chance to coincide. In spermatocytes this will occur only once every 18 min, on average, but a leisurely cell cycle provides ample time. Capture and release generate only change, not perfection. Tension from mitotic forces brings change to a halt by stabilizing the one correct attachment of chromosomes to the spindle. We show that tension directly affects stability, rather than merely constraining kinetochore position. This implies that chromosomes are attached to the spindle by tension-sensitive linkers whose stability is necessary for proper chromosome distribution but whose loss is necessary for the correction of errors.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8063861      PMCID: PMC2120171          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  28 in total

1.  Chromosome fiber dynamics and congression oscillations in metaphase PtK2 cells at 23 degrees C.

Authors:  D Wise; L Cassimeris; C L Rieder; P Wadsworth; E D Salmon
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  1991

2.  Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis.

Authors:  J G Ault; R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1982

4.  Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Chance encounters and precision in mitosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The prometaphase-I kinetochore microtubule bundle and kinetochore orientation in males.

Authors:  K Church; H P Lin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. II. Microtubule capture and ATP-dependent translocation.

Authors:  T J Mitchison; M W Kirschner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Microtubules of the kinetochore fiber turn over in metaphase but not in anaphase.

Authors:  G J Gorbsky; G G Borisy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence.

Authors:  T J Mitchison
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Koch
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  96 in total

1.  The consequences of a non-uniform tension across kinetochores: lessons from segregation of chromosomes in the permanent translocation heterozygote Oenothera.

Authors:  Z Hejnowicz; L J Feldman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells.

Authors:  B F McEwen; G K Chan; B Zubrowski; M S Savoian; M T Sauer; T J Yen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Authors:  Ajit P Joglekar; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  M G Poirier; J F Marko
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 5.  From a single double helix to paired double helices and back.

Authors:  Kim Nasmyth; Alexander Schleiffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 7.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  Towards a quantitative understanding of mitotic spindle assembly and mechanics.

Authors:  Alex Mogilner; Erin Craig
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  MCAK regulates chromosome alignment but is not necessary for preventing aneuploidy in mouse oocyte meiosis I.

Authors:  Crista Illingworth; Negar Pirmadjid; Paul Serhal; Katie Howe; Greg Fitzharris
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.