Literature DB >> 8063535

The bisection of horizontal and radial lines: a case study of normal controls and ten patients with left visuospatial neglect.

P W Halligan1, J C Marshall.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported on the bisection of horizontal and radial lines. In experiment 1, eighteen normal controls performed both tasks. In the horizontal orientation, approximately half the subjects produced transections displaced to the left of center and in half they were displaced to the right of center. With the radial orientation, all subjects save one bisected the line too far from the body. In experiment 2, ten patients with left neglect after unilateral right hemisphere damage performed the same two tasks. All patients showed left neglect, bisecting the horizontal lines too far to the right. Five of the patients also produced radial bisections that are outside normal limits; the predominant pattern is to bisect these lines too close to the body. The results show that severe left visuospatial neglect can co-occur with normal performance on the relative estimation of radial extents. However, in half the patients tested, performance was impaired in both orientations. The findings are set in the context of normative studies of visual anisotropy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8063535     DOI: 10.3109/00207459309000571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  9 in total

1.  Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task.

Authors:  Ancrêt Szpak; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Sergio Carlomagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Clock drawing in spatial neglect: a comprehensive analysis of clock perimeter, placement, and accuracy.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Kelly M Goedert
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.864

5.  Visual illusion and line bisection: a bias hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.

Authors:  Steven Leigh; James Danckert; Chris Eliasmith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Triangular backgrounds shift the bias of line bisection performance in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  M B Shulman; M P Alexander; R McGlinchey-Berroth; W Milberg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Diagonal spatial neglect.

Authors:  V W Mark; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Giovanni Messina; Ines Villano; Antonietta Messina; Ciro Rosario Ilardi; Marcellino Monda; Monica Salerno; Francesco Sessa; Maria Pina Mollica; Gina Cavaliere; Giovanna Trinchese; Fabiano Cimmino; Paolo Murabito; Angela Catapano; Vincenzo Monda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.