Literature DB >> 8059489

Biological effects of shock waves: induction of arrhythmia in piglet hearts.

M Delius1, E Hoffmann, G Steinbeck, P Conzen.   

Abstract

During lithotripsy by electrohydraulic or electromagnetic lithotripters, the application of extracorporeal shock waves has to be synchronized with the electrocardiogram to reduce the induction of arrhythmias. The relation between the refractory period of the cardiac cycle and arrhythmia induction by shock waves, and the underlying mechanism have so far not been examined. In this experiment, the cardiac response to shock waves administered at 20 kV by an electrohydraulic lithotripter was assessed in nine piglets. The focus was positioned 5, 10 and 15 cm caudal to the apex of the left ventricle, and in some piglets also at the apex. The interval following the R-wave was determined during which the heart was refractory to shock wave stimulation by either single discharges or shock-wave bursts, i.e., groups of discharges separated by 10 ms intervals. This mechanical refractory period was compared to its electrical counterpart, which was determined by transvenous intracardiac atrial stimulation. As a result, mechanical refractory periods following the R-wave were at 5 cm distance 60 ms for single discharges and 70 ms for bursts (medians; range 10-180 ms); both stimulation modes were highly correlated (r = 0.88). While a similar result was obtained with the focus positioned directly at the cardiac apex, at 10 cm distance from it, bursts elicited a cardiac response significantly more often (in nine vs. two piglets). At 15 cm distance, no response was obtained at all. Both mechanical and electrical atrial refractory periods were in a similar range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8059489     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90068-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Variables influencing the likelihood of cardiac dysrhythmias during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Thomas A A Skinner; Richard W Norman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Are ECG premature complexes induced by ultrasonic cavitation electrophysiological responses to irreversible cardiomyocyte injury?

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Chunyan Dou; Benedict R Lucchesi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Positive chronotropic effect caused by transthoracic ultrasound in heart of rats.

Authors:  Olivia C Coiado; Rahul S Yerrabelli; Anton P Christensen; Marcin Wozniak; Alex Lucas; William D O'Brien
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-08-03

8.  Therapeutic Ultrasound Effects on Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Cardiomyocytes Measured Optically and with Spectral Ultrasound.

Authors:  Andrew W Chen; George Saab; Aleksandar Jeremic; Vesna Zderic
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Ex Vivo Imaging of Ultrasound-Stimulated Metabolic Activity in Rat Pancreatic Slices.

Authors:  Andrew W Chen; Aleksandar Jeremic; Vesna Zderic
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Non-invasive cardiac pacing with image-guided focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Fabrice Marquet; Pierre Bour; Fanny Vaillant; Sana Amraoui; Rémi Dubois; Philippe Ritter; Michel Haïssaguerre; Mélèze Hocini; Olivier Bernus; Bruno Quesson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.