Literature DB >> 8059482

Current status of research on biophysical effects of ultrasound.

S B Barnett1, G R ter Haar, M C Ziskin, W L Nyborg, K Maeda, J Bang.   

Abstract

This overview of bioeffects of ultrasound presents some key aspects of selected papers dealing with biophysical end-points. Its purpose is to establish a basis for exposure and dosimetric standards for medical ultrasonic equipment. It is intended to provide essential background resource material for the medical/scientific community, and more specifically for scientific working groups. This document was prepared by members of the Safety Committee of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. It was produced as a resource document in response to a request for information by Working Group 12 (Ultrasound exposure parameters) of the International Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 87, Ultrasonics. IEC TC 87, WG12 is the working group responsible for generating international standards for the classification of equipment by its acoustic fields based on safety thresholds. Our paper is intended to update and supplement information on the thermal mechanism provided in the publication, "WFUMB Symposium on Safety and Standardisation in Medical Ultrasound: Issues and Recommendations Regarding Thermal Mechanisms for Biological Effects of Ultrasound" (WFUMB 1992). It also provides an overview of trends in research into nonthermal mechanisms as a preliminary to the next WFUMB Symposium on Safety of Medical Ultrasound when this subject will be examined in detail by a select group of international experts. The WFUMB-sponsored workshop will take place in Utsunomiya, Japan during 11-15th July, 1994. The purpose of the meeting is to evaluate the scientific literature and to formulate internationally accepted recommendations on the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound that may be endorsed as official policy of the WFUMB. It should be noted that the current publication is not intended for review or endorsement as an official WFUMB document. It is produced as a scientific paper by individuals who are members of the WFUMB Safety Committee, and it therefore represents the opinions of the authors. Nevertheless, during the preparation of this document, contributions were received from members of the International Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 87 as well as many other individual experts, and the authors sincerely acknowledge their support.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8059482     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90060-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  22 in total

1.  Intracellular drug delivery using low-frequency ultrasound: quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability.

Authors:  K Keyhani; H R Guzmán; A Parsons; T N Lewis; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review.

Authors:  William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini; Bryant J Staples
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Ultrasound in the management of osteoarthritis: part I: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  John Z Srbely
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2008-03

4.  Localized removal of layers of metal, polymer, or biomaterial by ultrasound cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  David Fernandez Rivas; Bram Verhaagen; James R T Seddon; Aaldert G Zijlstra; Lei-Meng Jiang; Luc W M van der Sluis; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse; Han J G E Gardeniers
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  High intensity focused ultrasound-induced gene activation in solid tumors.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Takashi Kon; Chuanyuan Li; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Non-invasive assessment and control of ultrasound-mediated membrane permeabilization.

Authors:  J Liu; T N Lewis; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Authors:  Boris Krasovitski; Victor Frenkel; Shy Shoham; Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Saving cells from ultrasound-induced apoptosis: quantification of cell death and uptake following sonication and effects of targeted calcium chelation.

Authors:  J D Hutcheson; R K Schlicher; H K Hicks; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  High intensity focused ultrasound-induced gene activation in sublethally injured tumor cells in vitro.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Takashi Kon; Chuanyuan Li; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison of continuous vs. pulsed focused ultrasound in treated muscle tissue as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, histological analysis, and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Walter Hundt; Esther L Yuh; Silke Steinbach; Mark D Bednarski; Samira Guccione
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.