Literature DB >> 8054812

The risks of reoperation for prosthetic valve dysfunction.

Y Kawachi1, K Matuzaki, R Tominaga, H Yasui, K Tokunaga.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted on 124 patients who underwent re-replacement of previously implanted prosthetic heart valves for structural valve failure, prosthetic valve endocarditis, periprosthetic leak, a thrombosed valve, hemolysis, or prophylactic removal. In total, 85% of the explanted valves were bioprostheses, and 70% of the newly implanted valves were mechanical valves. The overall operative mortality rate was 8.1%, being 3.2% of 95 single valve recipients and 25.0% of 28 double valve recipients (P < 0.001). The overall mortality rate dropped from 13.6% of 66 patients before 1988, to 1.7% of 58 patients encountered in the last 3 years (P < 0.02). Since 1988, a third of the patients have undergone reoperation without homologous blood transfusion. A univariate analysis revealed eight operative risk factors, namely: higher values of preoperative blood urea nitrogen or total bilirubin, double valve replacement at the redo operation, NYHA class IV, urgency of reoperation, a duration of implantation of less than 3 months, reoperation in the earlier period of this study, and reexploration for bleeding or cardiac tamponade after re-replacement surgery. A multivariate statistical analysis demonstrated that preoperative blood urea nitrogen, urgency of reoperation, double valve replacement, and the duration of implantation were independent risk factors. Thus, we recommend that surgery be performed early, before the occurrence of other organ failure induced by congestive heart failure due to any form of valve dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8054812     DOI: 10.1007/bf01427034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  13 in total

1.  Reoperations on heart valve prostheses: an analysis of operative risks and late results.

Authors:  S Pansini; G Ottino; P G Forsennati; G Serpieri; G Zattera; R Casabona; M di Summa; M Villani; G A Poletti; M Morea
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Aortic valve replacement for active infectious endocarditis in 108 patients. A comparison of freehand allograft valves with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses.

Authors:  D Haydock; B Barratt-Boyes; T Macedo; J W Kirklin; E Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Technical considerations in reoperation for porcine bioprosthetic valve failure.

Authors:  U Bortolotti; A Mazzucco; A Milano; V Gallucci
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.620

4.  Reoperations for valve surgery: perioperative mortality and determinants of risk for 1,000 patients, 1958-1984.

Authors:  B W Lytle; D M Cosgrove; P C Taylor; C C Gill; M Goormastic; L R Golding; R W Stewart; F D Loop
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Reoperation on prosthetic heart valves. An analysis of risk factors in 552 patients.

Authors:  D G Husebye; J R Pluth; J M Piehler; H V Schaff; T A Orszulak; F J Puga; G K Danielson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Superior protective effect of low-calcium, magnesium-free potassium cardioplegic solution on ischemic myocardium. Clinical study in comparison with St. Thomas' Hospital solution.

Authors:  K Kinoshita; M Oe; K Tokunaga
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Comparative study of cell saver and ultrafiltration nontransfusion in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Y Nakamura; M Masuda; Y Toshima; T Asou; M Oe; K Kinoshita; Y Kawachi; J Tanaka; K Tokunaga
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Early and late prognosis after reoperation for prosthetic valve replacement.

Authors:  X Bosch; J L Pomar; L C Pelletier
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Catastrophic hemorrhage during redo sternotomy.

Authors:  A R Dobell; A K Jain
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Obstruction of mechanical heart valve prostheses: clinical aspects and surgical management.

Authors:  E Deviri; P Sareli; T Wisenbaugh; S L Cronje
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Redo surgery risk in patients with cardiac prosthetic valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Marek Maciejewski; Katarzyna Piestrzeniewicz; Agata Bielecka-Dąbrowa; Monika Piechowiak; Ryszard Jaszewski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.318

2.  Concomitant mitral valve surgery with aortic valve replacement: a 21-year experience with a single mechanical prosthesis.

Authors:  Niall C McGonigle; J Mark Jones; Pushpinder Sidhu; Simon W Macgowan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 1.637

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.