Literature DB >> 8051240

Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection of goats.

E Díaz-Aparicio1, C Marín, B Alonso-Urmeneta, V Aragón, S Pérez-Ortiz, M Pardo, J M Blasco, R Díaz, I Moriyón.   

Abstract

Five serological assays were evaluated for the diagnosis of brucellosis in goats: the rose bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT), radial immunodiffusion (RID) with Brucella and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 polysaccharides, counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) with cytosol, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with polyclonal and protein G conjugates and smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS), native hapten polysaccharide (NH), or cytosol antigens. For optimal sensitivity, RBT had to be used with sera-antigen at a 3:1 dilution. In the RID test, Brucella melitensis biotype 1 NH could not be replaced by Brucella abortus biotype 1 or Y. enterocolitica 0:9 polysaccharides. In the ELISA, S-LPS and NH gave similar results and the protein G conjugate increased the specificity. With the sera from 55 B. melitensis culture-positive goats, the sensitivity was 100% for RBT, CFT (titer > or = 4), and ELISA with S-LPS or NH; 94% for RID; and 93% for CIEP. All tests were negative (100% specific) when testing the sera from 127 brucella-free goats. Larger discrepancies among the results of the serological tests were obtained with sera from goats of areas where brucellosis is endemic. When the sera of 20 young goats vaccinated subcutaneously (10(9) CFU of B. melitensis Rev 1) and bled 6 months later were examined, the specificities were as follows: NH ELISA, 60%; CFT and S-LPS ELISA, 75%; RBT, 80%; CIEP, 90%; and RID, 94%. With the sera from 10 young goats vaccinated conjunctivally (10(9) CFU of B. melitensis Rev 1) all tests were 100% specific 4 months after vaccination. The proportion of goats giving a positive reaction after vaccination decreased faster in RID than in other tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8051240      PMCID: PMC263630          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1159-1165.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  31 in total

1.  A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples.

Authors:  M A Markwell; S M Haas; L L Bieber; N E Tolbert
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 3.365

2.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Characterization of a native polysaccharide hapten from Brucella melitensis.

Authors:  E Moreno; H Mayer; I Moriyon
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  An ELISA with Brucella lipopolysaccharide antigen for the diagnosis of B. melitensis infection in sheep and for the evaluation of serological responses following subcutaneous or conjunctival B. melitensis strain Rev 1 vaccination.

Authors:  M P Jiménez de Bagüés; C M Marín; J M Blasco; I Moriyón; C Gamazo
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Radial immunodiffusion test with a Brucella polysaccharide antigen for differentiating infected from vaccinated cattle.

Authors:  R Diaz; P Garatea; L M Jones; I Moriyon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Purification and some properties of streptococcal protein G, a novel IgG-binding reagent.

Authors:  L Björck; G Kronvall
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Brucella abortus 1119-3 O-chain polysaccharide to differentiate sera from B. abortus S-19-vaccinated and field-strain-infected cattle by agar gel immunodiffusion.

Authors:  J W Cherwonogrodzky; K H Nielsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Some structural and biological properties of Brucella endotoxin.

Authors:  D Leong; R Diaz; K Milner; J Rudbach; J B Wilson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Outer membrane proteins of Brucella abortus: isolation and characterization.

Authors:  D R Verstreate; M T Creasy; N T Caveney; C L Baldwin; M W Blab; A J Winter
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Serological cross-reactions between different Brucella species and Yersinia enterocolitica. Immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis.

Authors:  B Hurvell
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  28 in total

1.  Protection against brucellosis in goats, five years after vaccination with reduced-dose Brucella melitensis Rev 1 vaccine.

Authors:  E Díaz-Aparicio; L Hernández; F Suárez-Güemes
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Use of an immunobinding test on nitrocellulose paper to diagnose caprine brucellosis.

Authors:  E Santellano-Estrada; F Infante; E Díaz-Aparicio; G H Flores-Gutiérrez
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Bacterial persistence and immunity in goats vaccinated with a purE deletion mutant or the parental 16M strain of Brucella melitensis.

Authors:  N F Cheville; S C Olsen; A E Jensen; M G Stevens; A M Florance; H S Houng; E S Drazek; R L Warren; T L Hadfield; D L Hoover
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Bayesian estimation of the seroprevalence of brucellosis in humans and livestock in Kyrgyzstan.

Authors:  S Dürr; B Bonfoh; E Schelling; J Kasymbekov; M G Doherr; N Toktobaev; T Schueth; J Zinsstag
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.181

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in goats in areas of Mexico with and without brucellosis control campaign.

Authors:  David Oseguera Montiel; Klaas Frankena; Henk Udo; Nícola Maria Keilbach Baer; Akke van der Zijpp
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Evaluation of North American antibody detection tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in goats.

Authors:  A B Mikolon; I A Gardner; S K Hietala; J Hernandez de Anda; E Chamizo Pestaña; S G Hennager; A J Edmondson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Use of the Brucella melitensis native hapten to diagnose brucellosis in goats by a rapid, simple, and specific fluorescence polarization assay.

Authors:  Carlos Ramírez-Pfeiffer; Efrén Díaz-Aparicio; Ricardo Gomez-Flores; Cristina Rodríguez-Padilla; Alberto Morales-Loredo; Genoveva Alvarez-Ojeda
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-04-02

8.  Seroepidemiological investigation of brucellosis in sheep abortions in Kars, Turkey.

Authors:  Ozgur Celebi; H Ibrahim Atabay
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  Large scale immune profiling of infected humans and goats reveals differential recognition of Brucella melitensis antigens.

Authors:  Li Liang; Diana Leng; Chad Burk; Rie Nakajima-Sasaki; Matthew A Kayala; Vidya L Atluri; Jozelyn Pablo; Berkay Unal; Thomas A Ficht; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Mayuko Saito; W John W Morrow; Xiaowu Liang; Pierre Baldi; Robert H Gilman; Joseph M Vinetz; Renée M Tsolis; Philip L Felgner
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-05-04

10.  Serological diagnosis of Brucella infections in odontocetes.

Authors:  Gabriela Hernández-Mora; Charles A Manire; Rocío González-Barrientos; Elías Barquero-Calvo; Caterina Guzmán-Verri; Lydia Staggs; Rachel Thompson; Esteban Chaves-Olarte; Edgardo Moreno
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.