Literature DB >> 23420068

Prevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in goats in areas of Mexico with and without brucellosis control campaign.

David Oseguera Montiel1, Klaas Frankena, Henk Udo, Nícola Maria Keilbach Baer, Akke van der Zijpp.   

Abstract

Brucellosis is a major constraint for small-scale goat farming systems in Mexico. This study estimated the prevalence of testing positive to brucellosis and identified and quantified risk factors in goats from small-scale farms of Michoacán that had participated in a brucellosis campaign (i.e. vaccination, serological testing, culling and awareness) and of Jalisco that had negligible brucellosis campaign participation. A cross-sectional serological survey was conducted among 1,713 goats of 83 flocks. The prevalence of testing positive to brucellosis was higher (38%) in Jalisco than in Michoacán (11%). Logistic regression analysis indicated that goats from Michoacán had lower odds to test positive for brucellosis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.48) compared to goats from Jalisco. Goats in zero-grazing systems had lower odds than goats in grazing systems (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.57). When goats were kept in pens with low density (0.002 to 0.22 goat/m(2)), odds was lower (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.67) compared to goats kept in pens with higher density (0.23 to 1 goat/m(2)). Odds was higher for testing positive when farmers bought goats from goat traders (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.15-2.87) compared to farmers who did not. If scavenger poultry had access to goat pens, the odds was half (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.83) of those where poultry had no access. Regular disinfection of the pen reduced the odds (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99) compared to where disinfection was not regular. The brucellosis control campaign was effective in reducing brucellosis seropositivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420068     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013-0375-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  13 in total

Review 1.  WIN EPISCOPE 2.0: improved epidemiological software for veterinary medicine.

Authors:  M Thrusfield; C Ortega; I de Blas; J P Noordhuizen; K Frankena
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2001-05-05       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Serological diagnosis of brucellosis.

Authors:  K Nielsen; W L Yu
Journal:  Prilozi       Date:  2010

Review 3.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model.

Authors:  D W Hosmer; T Hosmer; S Le Cessie; S Lemeshow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Control and eradication strategies for brucella melitensis infection in sheep and goats.

Authors:  J M Blasco
Journal:  Prilozi       Date:  2010

5.  A model of animal-human brucellosis transmission in Mongolia.

Authors:  J Zinsstag; F Roth; D Orkhon; G Chimed-Ochir; M Nansalmaa; J Kolar; P Vounatsou
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection of goats.

Authors:  E Díaz-Aparicio; C Marín; B Alonso-Urmeneta; V Aragón; S Pérez-Ortiz; M Pardo; J M Blasco; R Díaz; I Moriyón
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Human health benefits from livestock vaccination for brucellosis: case study.

Authors:  Felix Roth; Jakob Zinsstag; Dontor Orkhon; G Chimed-Ochir; Guy Hutton; Ottorino Cosivi; Guy Carrin; Joachim Otte
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 8.  Human brucellosis.

Authors:  María Pía Franco; Maximilian Mulder; Robert H Gilman; Henk L Smits
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  The "effects" of Rev-1 vaccination of sheep and goats on human brucellosis in Greece.

Authors:  A Minas; M Minas; A Stournara; S Tselepidis
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Seroprevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis of goats in herds of Michoacan, Mexico.

Authors:  J L Solorio-Rivera; J C Segura-Correa; L G Sánchez-Gil
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.670

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Retrospective and prospective perspectives on zoonotic brucellosis.

Authors:  Edgardo Moreno
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 2.  Caprine brucellosis: A historically neglected disease with significant impact on public health.

Authors:  Carlos A Rossetti; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa; Estefanía Maurizio
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-08-17

Review 3.  Susceptibility of Avian Species to Brucella Infection: A Hypothesis-Driven Study.

Authors:  Gamal Wareth; Ahmed Kheimar; Heinrich Neubauer; Falk Melzer
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-01-24

4.  Effect of climatic factors on the seasonal fluctuation of human brucellosis in Yulin, northern China.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Zurong Yang; Weifeng Liang; Tianci Guo; Yong Long; Zhongjun Shao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.