Literature DB >> 18385457

Use of the Brucella melitensis native hapten to diagnose brucellosis in goats by a rapid, simple, and specific fluorescence polarization assay.

Carlos Ramírez-Pfeiffer1, Efrén Díaz-Aparicio, Ricardo Gomez-Flores, Cristina Rodríguez-Padilla, Alberto Morales-Loredo, Genoveva Alvarez-Ojeda.   

Abstract

The performance of the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) using the recently described Brucella melitensis native hapten and the Brucella abortus O-polysaccharide tracer was evaluated and compared with those of The World Organization for Animal Health tests related to indirect and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as classification variables for goat sera obtained from a high-prevalence area where vaccination was performed; test series were also evaluated to increase the final specificity of the tests. Our results showed that the respective relative sensitivity and specificity were 99.7% and 32.5% for the rose Bengal test with a 3% cell concentration (RBT3), 92.8% and 68.8% for the rose Bengal test with 8% cell concentration (RBT8), 98.4% and 84.9% for the Canadian complement fixation test (CFT), 83.7% and 65.5% for the Mexican CFT, 98.4% and 81.0% for the buffered plate agglutination test (BPAT), and 78.1% and 89.3% for the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA). The use of the FPA as the secondary test significantly increased the final specificities of test combinations; the screening tests BPAT, RBT3, and RBT8 plus FPA resulted in 90%, 91.2%, and 91.3% final specificities, respectively, whereas for the combinations RBT3 plus Mexican CFT, RBT8 plus Mexican CFT, and BPAT plus Canadian CFT, the specificities were 65.5%, 63.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. The results suggested that the FPA may be routinely applied as an adaptable screening test for diagnosis of goat brucellosis, since its cutoff can be adjusted to improve its sensitivity or specificity, it is a rapid and simple test, it can be the test of choice when specificity is relevant or when an alternative confirmatory test is not available, and it is not affected by vaccination, thus reducing the number of goats wrongly slaughtered due to misdiagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385457      PMCID: PMC2446613          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00046-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  20 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology.

Authors:  Klaus Nielsen
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for differentiation of the antibody response of cattle naturally infected with Brucella abortus or vaccinated with strain 19.

Authors:  K Nielsen; J W Cherwonogrodzky; J R Duncan; D R Bundle
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.156

Review 3.  Control of Brucella melitensis brucellosis in developing countries.

Authors:  J Kolar
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  A simple method for the extraction of polysaccharide B from Brucella cells for use in the radial immunodiffusion test diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  R Diaz; J Toyos; M D Salvó; M L Pardo
Journal:  Ann Rech Vet       Date:  1981

6.  A competition enzyme immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis.

Authors:  A P MacMillan; I Greiser-Wilke; V Moennig; L A Mathias
Journal:  Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1990-02

7.  Radial immunodiffusion test with a Brucella polysaccharide antigen for differentiating infected from vaccinated cattle.

Authors:  R Diaz; P Garatea; L M Jones; I Moriyon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Assessment of a monoclonal antibody-based competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for diagnosis of brucellosis in infected and Rev. 1 vaccinated sheep and goats.

Authors:  F Biancifiori; F Garrido; K Nielsen; L Moscati; M Durán; D Gall
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Improved performance of Brucella melitensis native hapten over Brucella abortus OPS tracer on goat antibody detection by the fluorescence polarization assay.

Authors:  C Ramírez-Pfeiffer; E Díaz-Aparicio; C Rodríguez-Padilla; A Morales-Loredo; G Alvarez-Ojeda; R Gomez-Flores
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 2.046

10.  Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification.

Authors:  G G Baily; J B Krahn; B S Drasar; N G Stoker
Journal:  J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1992-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Large scale immune profiling of infected humans and goats reveals differential recognition of Brucella melitensis antigens.

Authors:  Li Liang; Diana Leng; Chad Burk; Rie Nakajima-Sasaki; Matthew A Kayala; Vidya L Atluri; Jozelyn Pablo; Berkay Unal; Thomas A Ficht; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Mayuko Saito; W John W Morrow; Xiaowu Liang; Pierre Baldi; Robert H Gilman; Joseph M Vinetz; Renée M Tsolis; Philip L Felgner
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-05-04

2.  A survey of zoonotic diseases in trade cattle slaughtered at Tanga city abattoir: a cause of public health concern.

Authors:  E S Swai; L Schoonman
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2012-01

3.  Latent class evaluation of the performance of serological tests for exposure to Brucella spp. in cattle, sheep, and goats in Tanzania.

Authors:  Rebecca F Bodenham; Stella Mazeri; Sarah Cleaveland; John A Crump; Folorunso O Fasina; William A de Glanville; Daniel T Haydon; Rudovick R Kazwala; Tito J Kibona; Venance P Maro; Michael J Maze; Blandina T Mmbaga; Niwael J Mtui-Malamsha; Gabriel M Shirima; Emanuel S Swai; Kate M Thomas; Barend M deC Bronsvoort; Jo E B Halliday
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-08-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.