Literature DB >> 8050255

Patient-specific reminder letters and pediatric well-child-care show rates.

J R Campbell1, P G Szilagyi, L E Rodewald, C Doane, K J Roghmann.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether patient-specific letters, which describe the content of an upcoming well-child appointment, improve the show rate of well-child appointments better than postcard reminders. In this prospective clinical trial conducted at a pediatric continuity clinic in a teaching hospital, 288 newborns were randomized to a letter, postcard, or control group. For every well-child appointment, families were sent either a letter pertaining to the particular well-child appointment or a postcard; the control group received no reminders. There were no differences in demographics among the groups. The show rates between the letter and postcard groups were not different, but were significantly higher than the show rate for the control group (75.0%, 73.7%, and 67.5%, respectively; P < .05). A cost comparison between the use of postcards versus not using postcards revealed a benefit in the former. We concluded postcard reminders are effective in improving show rates for well-child-care visits, and that patient-specific letters have no additional benefit above that of postcard reminders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8050255     DOI: 10.1177/000992289403300503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  14 in total

1.  Public health in managed care: a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of postcard reminders.

Authors:  A E Clayton; L A McNutt; H L Homestead; T W Hartman; S Senecal
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Email consultations in health care: 1--scope and effectiveness.

Authors:  Josip Car; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-21

3.  Analysis of a practice management computer software program for owner compliance with recall reminders.

Authors:  Vicki J Adams; Cheryl L Waldner; John R Campbell
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Preferences of interns and residents for E-mail, paging, or traditional methods for the delivery of different types of clinical information.

Authors:  M M Wagner; S A Eisenstadt; W R Hogan; M C Pankaskie
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

5.  Effect of reminder notices on the timeliness of early childhood immunizations.

Authors:  G L Bjornson; D W Scheifele; C Lajeunesse; A Bell
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Effect on hospital attendance rates of giving patients a copy of their referral letter: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  W Hamilton; A Round; D Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-22

Review 7.  Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters "in absentia".

Authors:  D Revere; P J Dunbar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Barriers to Receiving Follow-Up Eye Care and Detection of Non-Glaucomatous Ocular Pathology in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project.

Authors:  Cindy X Zheng; Wanda D Hu; Judie Tran; Linda Siam; Giuliana G Berardi; Harjeet Sembhi; Lisa A Hark; L Jay Katz; Michael Waisbourd
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-04

9.  Urology out-patient non-attenders: are we wasting our time?

Authors:  R G Casey; M R Quinlan; R Flynn; R Grainger; T E D McDermott; J A Thornhill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Haemophilus influenzae invasive disease in the United States, 1994-1995: near disappearance of a vaccine-preventable childhood disease.

Authors:  K M Bisgard; A Kao; J Leake; P M Strebel; B A Perkins; M Wharton
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.