Literature DB >> 26499385

Barriers to Receiving Follow-Up Eye Care and Detection of Non-Glaucomatous Ocular Pathology in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project.

Cindy X Zheng1, Wanda D Hu1, Judie Tran1, Linda Siam1, Giuliana G Berardi1, Harjeet Sembhi1, Lisa A Hark1, L Jay Katz1, Michael Waisbourd2.   

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate adherence rates and identify barriers to receiving follow-up eye care in participants diagnosed with significant non-glaucomatous eye pathology in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. This community-based project aimed to improve detection, management, treatment, and follow-up eye care of individuals at high risk for glaucoma in community-based settings. Participants throughout Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA were enrolled. After a comprehensive eye examination, follow-up recommendations were given to each participant. A telephone survey was administered to individuals diagnosed with non-glaucomatous ocular pathology 3 months after initial eye examination to assess rates of follow-up and to evaluate potential barriers to follow-up. Of the 1649 participants enrolled in this project, 249 (15 %) were diagnosed with significant non-glaucomatous ocular pathology requiring follow-up care. There were 143 (57 %) who responded to the telephone survey. Respondents had a median age of 72 years, and were predominately female (69 %) and African-American (64 %). Of the respondents, 36 (25 %) attended a follow-up appointment. Participants who did not remember the results of their examinations, did not remember their recommendations, and had not seen an eye doctor within the past year were less likely to make a follow-up appointment (P = 0.04, 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). The Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Program was able to detect a significant amount of non-glaucomatous ocular pathology requiring follow-up care. Actual follow-up rates were sub-optimal. Further research is needed to determine interventions to overcome barriers and increase adherence with follow-up recommendations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access to eye care; Barriers; Community eye screening; Detection of eye disease; Underserved population

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26499385     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-015-0104-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  33 in total

1.  Patterns of adherence to diabetes vision care guidelines: baseline findings from the Diabetic Retinopathy Awareness Program.

Authors:  E R Schoenfeld; J M Greene; S Y Wu; M C Leske
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Impact of severity and bilaterality of visual impairment on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Joanne Wu; Kelly Chong; Stanley P Azen; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010.

Authors:  Donatella Pascolini; Silvio Paolo Mariotti
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in unmet need for vision care among children with special health care needs.

Authors:  Kevin C Heslin; Richard Casey; Magda A Shaheen; Fernando Cardenas; Richard S Baker
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06

5.  Eye care for elderly Americans with diabetes mellitus. Failure to meet current guidelines.

Authors:  F Wang; J C Javitt
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals.

Authors:  M V Williams; R M Parker; D W Baker; N S Parikh; K Pitkin; W C Coates; J R Nurss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The health care experience of patients with low literacy.

Authors:  D W Baker; R M Parker; M V Williams; K Pitkin; N S Parikh; W Coates; M Imara
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1996-06

8.  A qualitative study in the United Kingdom of factors influencing attendance by patients with diabetes at ophthalmic outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Karinya Lewis; Daksha Patel; David Yorston; David Charteris
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.648

9.  Patient-specific reminder letters and pediatric well-child-care show rates.

Authors:  J R Campbell; P G Szilagyi; L E Rodewald; C Doane; K J Roghmann
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.168

10.  Printed educational messages aimed at family practitioners fail to increase retinal screening among their patients with diabetes: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN72772651].

Authors:  Merrick Zwarenstein; Susan K Shiller; Ruth Croxford; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Diane Kelsall; J Michael Paterson; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Austin; Karen Tu; Lingsong Yun; Janet E Hux
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  4 in total

1.  Self-reported Use of Eye Care Among Adult Chinese Americans: The Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Xuejuan Jiang; Rohit Varma; Mina Torres; Chunyi Hsu; Roberta McKean-Cowdin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  A Randomized Trial to Improve Adherence to Follow-up Eye Examinations Among People With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Benjamin E Leiby; Sarah E Hegarty; Tingting Zhan; Jonathan S Myers; L Jay Katz; Julia A Haller; Michael Waisbourd; Christine Burns; Meskerem Divers; Jeanne Molineaux; Jeffrey Henderer; Charles Brodowski; Lisa A Hark
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  An Initiative to Improve Follow-up of Patients with Glaucoma.

Authors:  Calvin C Robbins; Sidrah Anjum; Amer Mosa Alwreikat; Michael Lee Cooper; Paul R Cotran; Shiyoung Roh; David J Ramsey
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22

4.  Assessment of patient follow-up from student-run free eye clinic to county ophthalmology clinic.

Authors:  Melanie Scheive; Lucas W Rowe; Hanna L Tso; Patrick Wurster; Nicholas E Kalafatis; David A Camp; Chi Wah Rudy Yung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.