Literature DB >> 6639719

Comparison of acuity tests and pattern evoked potential criteria: two mechanisms underly acuity maturation in man.

H Spekreijse.   

Abstract

A comparative study of acuity tests and pattern evoked potential (EP) criteria was performed on a total of 307 subjects, 214 of them at an age between 2 months post-term and 12 years. All were examined ophthalmologically prior to testing. It was shown that both psychophysical and EP estimated acuity improve in the same way until puberty. From birth to about 6 months a rapid improvement is found. This fast phase can probably be attributed to retinal morphological maturation. During this period a fair estimate of acuity can be obtained by determining the checksize that yields the largest EP; a conclusion of practical importance for screening. The subsequent slow improvement phase, which ends around puberty, is reflected in the development of the waveform of the pattern onset EP. Since it correlates with the growth of a spatial contrast specific component of extrastriate origin in the EP, the slow improvement phase most likely reflects maturation of central processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6639719     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90156-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Pattern visual evoked cortical potential waveforms and spatial frequency characteristics in children.

Authors:  H Yamazaki
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Check size dependency of the sources of the hemifield-onset evoked potential.

Authors:  P Ossenblok; D Reits; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Pattern reversal visual evoked response and Snellen visual acuity.

Authors:  O Katsumi; M C Mehta; E W Larson-Park; C J Skladzien; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Electrophysiologic testing techniques for children.

Authors:  A B Fulton; E E Hartmann; R M Hansen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.

Authors:  O Katsumi; S Denno; M Arai; J De Lopes Faria; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Contrast gain control and cortical TrkB signaling shape visual acuity.

Authors:  J Alexander Heimel; M Hadi Saiepour; Sridhara Chakravarthy; Josephine M Hermans; Christiaan N Levelt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  VEP maturation and visual acuity in infants and preschool children.

Authors:  Eva Lenassi; Katarina Likar; Branka Stirn-Kranjc; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 8.  From immature to mature pattern ERG and VEP.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 9.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.