Literature DB >> 7931386

Picturing unilateral spatial neglect: viewer versus object centred reference frames.

A Chatterjee1.   

Abstract

Vision theorists postulate that knowledge of objects in space is shaped by different spatial coordinate systems. An object may be represented by its location in relation to the viewer, or it may be represented by its own intrinsic spatial properties. When patients with left sided neglect fail to respond to stimuli on the left, it is not clear whether "left" refers to a viewer or an object centred reference frame. To uncouple these two reference frames, eight patients with neglect were asked to centre lines and objects in photographs. Viewer centred neglect would result in images appearing on the right side of photographs and object centred neglect would result in images appearing on the left. Four patients demonstrated viewer centred neglect and three demonstrated object centred neglect. One patient had variable performance, perhaps resulting from competing effects of both viewer and object centred neglect. Stimuli characteristics did not affect the spatial coordinate system in which neglect occurred. These results suggest that viewer centred and object centred reference frames are functionally dissociable, and that patients may have spatial neglect predominantly in either coordinate system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931386      PMCID: PMC485493          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.57.10.1236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  11 in total

1.  Distinct syndromes of hemineglect.

Authors:  J Binder; R Marshall; R Lazar; J Benjamin; J P Mohr
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1992-11

2.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome.

Authors:  M J Farah; J L Brunn; A B Wong; M A Wallace; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates?

Authors:  E Ladavas
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space.

Authors:  M Kinsbourne
Journal:  Trans Am Neurol Assoc       Date:  1970

5.  Visuo-spatial neglect: a new copying test to assess perceptual parsing.

Authors:  J C Marshall; P W Halligan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centered and body-centered.

Authors:  R Calvanio; P N Petrone; D N Levine
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity?

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  The psychophysical power law and unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  A Chatterjee; M Mennemeier; K M Heilman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions.

Authors:  G Gainotti; P Messerli; R Tissot
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 10.  A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  9 in total

1.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Right hemispatial neglect: frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Jonathan T Kleinman; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Rebecca F Gottesman; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Reperfusion of specific cortical areas is associated with improvement in distinct forms of hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Shaan Khurshid; Lydia A Trupe; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; John J Molitoris; Jared Medina; Richard Leigh; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Anatomy of spatial attention: insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke.

Authors:  Argye E Hillis; Melissa Newhart; Jennifer Heidler; Peter B Barker; Edward H Herskovits; Mahaveer Degaonkar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Dissociation between egocentric and allocentric visuospatial and tactile neglect in acute stroke.

Authors:  Elisabeth B Marsh; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Assessment and functional impact of allocentric neglect: a reminder from a case study.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah; Nicole Spaldo; A M Barrett; Peii Chen
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 8.  Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights.

Authors:  Roberto Gammeri; Claudio Iacono; Raffaella Ricci; Adriana Salatino
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Various tests of left neglect are associated with distinct territories of hypoperfusion in acute stroke.

Authors:  Colin Stein; Lisa Bunker; Brian Chu; Richard Leigh; Andreia Faria; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-03-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.