Literature DB >> 8041850

Factors influencing the return rate in a direct mail campaign to inform minority women about prevention of cervical cancer.

M B Dignan1, R Michielutte, D D Jones-Lighty, J Bahnson.   

Abstract

The Forsyth County Cervical Cancer Prevention Project was a 5-year community-based health education program funded by the National Cancer Institute. The program was developed to reduce cervical cancer mortality among black women in Forsyth County, and it was targeted to those ages 18 and older. The program tried to educate the target population through a combination of mass media and direct education. This paper reports on an experiment conducted to investigate sources of influence on the effectiveness of direct mail, a technique used to augment mass media health education. Direct mail has shown promise as a method for reaching target populations that are difficult to reach with other mass media approaches. Using commercially prepared mailing lists sorted by zip code and other characteristics of the resident, health-related materials can be targeted to persons at their homes. A randomized experiment involving 1,000 households was carried out to estimate the influence of type of postage and address (name versus "resident or occupant") on the response rate to direct mail. Results indicated that there was no significant advantage from use of first class over bulk rate postage, but the return was significantly greater when the envelope bore a name rather than "resident or occupant."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8041850      PMCID: PMC1403527     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  7 in total

1.  Implementation of mass media community health education: the Forsyth County Cervical Cancer Prevention Project.

Authors:  M Dignan; J Bahnson; P Sharp; P Beal; M Smith; R Michielutte
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1991-09

2.  Direct mail recruitment to home-based smoking and weight control programs: a comparison of strategies.

Authors:  T L Schmid; R W Jeffery; W L Hellerstedt
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Direct mail as a prompt for follow-up care among persons at risk for hypertension.

Authors:  D M Murray; C L Kurth; J R Finnegan; P L Pirie; J B Admire; R V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Evaluation and measurement: some dilemmas for health education.

Authors:  L W Green
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Nutrition communication program: a direct mail approach.

Authors:  A H Gillespie; J P Yarbrough; C E Roderuck
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1983-03

6.  The role of focus groups in health education for cervical cancer among minority women.

Authors:  M Dignan; R Michielutte; P Sharp; J Bahnson; L Young; P Beal
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1990-12

7.  Use of process evaluation to guide health education in Forsyth County's project to prevent cervical cancer.

Authors:  M B Dignan; R Michielutte; P C Sharp; L D Young; L A Daniels
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: increasing mammogram screening among the elderly.

Authors:  S A Fox; J A Stein; R J Sockloskie; M G Ory
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Recruitment methods employed in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Lisa Gren; Karen Broski; Jeffery Childs; Jill Cordes; Deborah Engelhard; Betsy Gahagan; Eduard Gamito; Vivien Gardner; Mindy Geisser; Darlene Higgins; Victoria Jenkins; Lois Lamerato; Karen Lappe; Heidi Lowery; Colleen McGuire; Mollie Miedzinski; Sheryl Ogden; Sally Tenorio; Gavin Watt; Bonita Wohlers; Pamela Marcus
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Community-based intervention to promote breast cancer awareness and screening: the Korean experience.

Authors:  Keeho Park; Woi Hyun Hong; Su Yeon Kye; Euichul Jung; Myung-hyun Kim; Hyeong Geun Park
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.