Literature DB >> 1899943

Use of process evaluation to guide health education in Forsyth County's project to prevent cervical cancer.

M B Dignan1, R Michielutte, P C Sharp, L D Young, L A Daniels.   

Abstract

The Forsyth County, NC, Cervical Cancer Prevention Project is a 5-year public health education program designed to increase the proportion of black women in the county who are appropriately screened for cervical cancer. In this paper, the authors report on process evaluation--the procedures used to monitor the intervention and to insure that the target population was reached with a high quality, community-based health education program. A system that encompasses documentation of program activities, interviews with women in waiting rooms of primary care providers, semiannual interviews with a panel of approximately 100 women from the target population, and telephone followup with participants in direct education workshops was designed and implemented. Through October 1990, more than 2,100 interviews had been conducted. Data from these activities have facilitated continued development and refinement of educational materials, provided guidance for developing new strategies for reaching the target population, and provided continuous feedback to program managers to allow monitoring the impact of all program activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1899943      PMCID: PMC1580194     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  7 in total

1.  A process evaluation of the District of Columbia "Know Your Body" project.

Authors:  V S Taggart; P J Bush; A E Zuckerman; P K Theiss
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.118

2.  Development of a community cancer education program: the Forsyth County, NC cervical cancer prevention project.

Authors:  R Michielutte; M B Dignan; H B Wells; L D Young; D S Jackson; P C Sharp
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Formative evaluation in school-based health promotion investigations.

Authors:  R I Evans; B E Raines; A E Owen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Measuring and tracking education program implementation: the Minnesota Heart Health Program experience.

Authors:  J R Finnegan; D M Murray; C Kurth; P McCarthy
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1989

5.  Pawtucket Heart Health Program: the process of stimulating community change.

Authors:  R C Lefebvre; T M Lasater; A R Assaf; R A Carleton
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl       Date:  1988

6.  Direct mail as a prompt for follow-up care among persons at risk for hypertension.

Authors:  D M Murray; C L Kurth; J R Finnegan; P L Pirie; J B Admire; R V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Avoiding type III errors in health education program evaluations: a case study.

Authors:  C E Basch; E M Sliepcevich; R S Gold; D F Duncan; L J Kolbe
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1985
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing the return rate in a direct mail campaign to inform minority women about prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M B Dignan; R Michielutte; D D Jones-Lighty; J Bahnson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Faith Moves Mountains: an Appalachian cervical cancer prevention program.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Jennifer Hatcher; Mark B Dignan; Brent Shelton; Sherry Wright; Kaye F Dollarhide
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.