Literature DB >> 8039965

Biomechanical comparison of methods of fixation of isolated osteotomies of the posterior acetabular column.

A Schopfer1, D DiAngelo, T Hearn, J Powell, M Tile.   

Abstract

Ten fresh frozen specimens of a hemipelvis, including the hip joint, capsule and proximal femur, from elderly cadavers were used to evaluate three methods of internal fixation of isolated posterior column osteotomies. Intact and reconstructed specimens were tested at 30 degrees and 60 degrees of hip flexion in a specially designed joint simulator. The three methods of fixation used were a single 3.5 mm reconstruction plate, two such plates, and a 4.5 mm lag screw with a single plate. Motion at the fracture site in three orthogonal directions, and the overall stiffness of the construct, were recorded simultaneously. No significant differences were noted in stiffness for the three procedures and all retained 80% of the intact stiffness. At 60 degrees of flexion, smaller interfragmentary compliances were allowed by fixation with a lag screw and a neutralisation plate (p < 0.05). At 30 degrees, the position of the load plane relative to the fracture plane allowed less interfragmentary motion, so that no significant differences were found between the 3 methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8039965     DOI: 10.1007/bf02484418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Displaced acetabular fractures.

Authors:  J M Matta; P O Merritt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Posterior acetabular wall fractures: a technique for screw placement.

Authors:  M J Bosse
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Operative treatment for acetabular fractures.

Authors:  M Heeg; H J Klasen; J D Visser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-05

4.  Operative treatment of complex acetabular fractures. Combined anterior and posterior exposures during the same procedure.

Authors:  M L Routt; M F Swiontkowski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Surgical management of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  J M Matta; E Letournel; B D Browner
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1986

6.  Radiological diagnosis of screw penetration of the hip joint in acetabular fracture reconstruction.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; E R Savolaine; M J Hoeflinger; W T Jackson
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  K A Mayo
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Complex acetabular fractures.

Authors:  J A Goulet; T J Bray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Stability of acetabular fractures after internal fixation. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  T Sawaguchi; T D Brown; H E Rubash; D C Mears
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-12

10.  Acetabulum fractures: classification and management.

Authors:  E Letournel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.176

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Superior border of the arcuate line: Three dimension reconstruction and digital measurements of the fixation route for pelvic and acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Ji Xiaoxi; Wang Fang; Wang Dongmei; Li Fan; Li Xiaoqin; Su Yunlong; Zhang Jie; Wang Qiugen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Biomechanical principles for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis].

Authors:  A Gänsslen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The Effect of Lateralization of a Pelvic Brim Plate on the Fixation of an Anterior Column Fracture: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Mehmet Burak Gökgöz; Bahadır Alemdaroğlu; Ahmet Özmeriç; Serkan İltar; Fatma K Erbay; Teyfik Demir
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  [Application of self-made spring plate for treatment of acetabular posterior wall fractures].

Authors:  Weijun An; Jianbin Sun; Zhizhong Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-15

5.  Biomechanical comparison of different stabilization constructs for unstable posterior wall fractures of acetabulum. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Yuntong Zhang; Yang Tang; Panfeng Wang; Xue Zhao; Shuogui Xu; Chuncai Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biomechanical analysis of the fixation systems for anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Jianyin Lei; Pengfei Dong; Zhiqiang Li; Feng Zhu; Zhihua Wang; Xianhua Cai
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Digital anatomical measurements and crucial bending areas of the fixation route along the inferior border of the arcuate line for pelvic and acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Chun Bi; Xiaoxi Ji; Fang Wang; Dongmei Wang; Qiugen Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Biomechanical Analysis of the Fixation System for T-Shaped Acetabular Fracture.

Authors:  Yanping Fan; Jianyin Lei; Feng Zhu; Zhiqiang Li; Weiyi Chen; Ximing Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Posterior column acetabular fracture fixation using a W-shaped angular plate: A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Ke Su; Song Liu; Tao Wu; Yingchao Yin; Ruipeng Zhang; Shilun Li; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.