Literature DB >> 7773895

Factors associated with the decision of family physicians to provide intrapartum care.

L F Smith1, J L Reynolds.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate which characteristics and beliefs of family physicians determine their decision to provide intrapartum care.
DESIGN: Confidential survey questionnaire mailed in spring 1993.
SETTING: Alberta and Ontario.
SUBJECTS: Random selection of 207 physicians who had graduated from medical school between 1953 and 1990 and were thought to be in family or general practice. Of 178 eligible physicians, usable replies were received from 104 (58.4%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Beliefs (measured on a 7-point Likert scale) about the relevance of 16 primary factors to the type of obstetric care provided; demographic, training and practice characteristics.
RESULTS: The respondents who provided intrapartum care differed from those who did not in their beliefs about the availability of a local hospital suitable for intrapartum care (p < 0.001), their practice partners' views on the role of family physicians in providing obstetric care (p < 0.002), their own concept of the role of family physicians in providing obstetric care (p < 0.001) and women's views on the type of obstetric care they want (p < 0.002). They also differed, although less significantly, in their beliefs about the adequacy of their obstetric training before entering family practice (p < 0.04), the expected effects of providing obstetric care on their free time (p < 0.006), their fear of malpractice litigation (p < 0.028) and their perceived competence in performing practical obstetric procedures (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that certain secondary factors were particularly relevant to the respondents' provision of intrapartum care at present. These included the physician's perceived competence at managing postpartum maternal hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 48.90, 90% confidence interval [CI] 4.70 to 509), the belief that medical insurance premiums should not be affected by the type of obstetric care provided (OR 3.55, 90% CI 1.67 to 7.57]) and the number of practice partners who provided intrapartum care (OR 10.08, 90% CI 2.31 to 44.10).
CONCLUSION: Several factors appear to influence family physicians in their decision to provide intrapartum care. This information will help to focus efforts to provide appropriate obstetric training for family practice residents and to retain involvement of family physicians in intrapartum care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7773895      PMCID: PMC1337976     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  16 in total

1.  Home births and minimal medical interventions.

Authors:  P E Treffers; M Eskes; G Kleiverda; D van Alten
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Withdrawal from maternity care. A comparison of family physicians in Ontario, Canada, and the United States.

Authors:  J Kruse; D Phillips; R M Wesley
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988.

Authors:  L F Smith; D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

4.  Looming manpower shortage has Canada's obstetricians worried.

Authors:  L Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Obstetric care in The Netherlands: regional differentiation in home delivery.

Authors:  L Hingstman; H Boon
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Attrition from obstetrical practice among family practice residency graduates.

Authors:  P E Tietze; S E Gaskins; M J McGinnis
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Obstetric privileges for family physicians: a national study.

Authors:  G Schmittling; C Tsou
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Choosing to do obstetrics in practice: factors affecting the decisions of third-year family practice residents.

Authors:  M A Smith; K P Howard
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Rising malpractice premiums and obstetric practice patterns. The impact on family physicians in Washington State.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; C L Wright
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-02

10.  Differences in the obstetric practices of obstetricians and family physicians in Washington State.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; L G Hart; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  5 in total

1.  Family physicians who provide intrapartum care and those who do not: very different ways of viewing childbirth.

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Janusz Kaczorowski; Jocelyn Tomkinson; Stephen Hearps; Nazli Baradaran; Rollin Brant
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The effects of medical liability on obstetric care supply in Michigan.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Kristine A Siefert; Peter D Jacobson; Jody R Lori; Scott B Ransom
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Family medicine obstetrics. Collaborative interdisciplinary program for a declining resource.

Authors:  David Price; Michelle Howard; Elizabeth Shaw; Joyce Zazulak; Heather Waters; David Chan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  In for the long haul. Which family physicians plan to continue delivering babies?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Ann Kelly; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Changing face of family practice.

Authors:  M J Bass; I R McWhinney; M Stewart; A Grindrod
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.275

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.