Literature DB >> 8035433

The ethics of screening: is 'screeningitis' an incurable disease?

D Shickle1, R Chadwick.   

Abstract

Screening programmes are becoming increasingly popular since prevention is considered 'better than cure'. While earlier diagnosis may result in more effective treatment for some, there will be consequent harm for others due to anxiety, stigma, side-effects etc. A screening test cannot guarantee the detection of all 'abnormal' cases, therefore there will be false reassurance for some. A proper consideration of the potential benefit and harm arising from screening may lead to the conclusion that the programme should not be offered. A modified utilitarian approach may be used for allocation of scarce resources in health care. Ethics has an important role in this evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8035433      PMCID: PMC1376367          DOI: 10.1136/jme.20.1.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  Response to: What counts as success in genetic counselling?

Authors:  Angus Clarke
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

Authors:  J Dixon; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The William Allan Memorial Award Address: evolution of a palatable multifactorial threshold model.

Authors:  F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.025

  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  "On a supposed right to lie [to the public] from benevolent motives": communicating health risks to the public.

Authors:  D Shickle
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2000

2.  Fragility, uncertainty, and healthcare.

Authors:  Wendy A Rogers; Mary J Walker
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2016-02

3.  Quantitative Evaluation of an Instrument to Identify Chronic Pain in HIV-Infected Individuals.

Authors:  Jessica S Merlin; Andrew O Westfall; Eric Chamot; Michael Saag; Melonie Walcott; Christine Ritchie; Stefan Kertesz
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.205

4.  Conceptual issues for screening in the genomic era - time for an update?

Authors:  Caroline F Wright; Ron L Zimmern
Journal:  Epidemiol Biostat Public Health       Date:  2014-12-11

5.  "Couldn't you have done just as well without the screening?". A qualitative study of benefits from screening as perceived by people without a high cardiovascular risk score.

Authors:  Karen-Dorthe Bach Nielsen; Lise Dyhr; Torsten Lauritzen; Kirsti Malterud
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 6.  Genetic testing and sports medicine ethics.

Authors:  Michael John McNamee; Arno Müller; Ivo van Hilvoorde; Søren Holm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  'A double-edged sword': Perceived benefits and harms of active case-finding for people with presumptive tuberculosis and communities-A qualitative study based on expert interviews.

Authors:  Olivia Biermann; Raina Klüppelberg; Knut Lönnroth; Kerri Viney; Maxine Caws; Salla Atkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'.

Authors:  Tracy Merlin; Adele Weston; Rebecca Tooher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Bone mineral density surveillance for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: evidence-based recommendations from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group.

Authors:  Jenneke E van Atteveld; Renée L Mulder; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Melissa M Hudson; Leontien C M Kremer; Roderick Skinner; W Hamish Wallace; Louis S Constine; Claire E Higham; Sue C Kaste; Riitta Niinimäki; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Nathalie Alos; Danilo Fintini; Kimberly J Templeton; Leanne M Ward; Eva Frey; Roberto Franceschi; Vesna Pavasovic; Seth E Karol; Nadia L Amin; Lynda M Vrooman; Arja Harila-Saari; Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt; Robert D Murray; Edit Bardi; Maarten H Lequin; Maria Felicia Faienza; Olga Zaikova; Claire Berger; Stefano Mora; Kirsten K Ness; Sebastian J C M M Neggers; Saskia M F Pluijm; Jill H Simmons; Natascia Di Iorgi
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 44.867

10.  Applying bioethical principles to human biomonitoring.

Authors:  Myron Harrison
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.