Literature DB >> 8034642

Functional role in ligand binding and receptor activation of an asparagine residue present in the sixth transmembrane domain of all muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

K Blüml1, E Mutschler, J Wess.   

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms through which muscarinic receptors are activated upon binding of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) are still poorly understood. Classical structure-function relationship studies have previously established that the ACh ester moiety plays a key role in muscarinic receptor recognition and activation. Consistent with this notion, all recently proposed three-dimensional muscarinic receptor models predict that an asparagine residue present in transmembrane domain VI of all muscarinic receptors is critically involved in the binding of the ACh ester moiety by means of hydrogen bonding. To test the correctness of this hypothesis, we created several mutant m3 muscarinic receptors in which this residue (Asn507) was replaced with alanine, serine, or aspartic acid. Radioligand binding studies with transfected COS-7 cells showed that, in contrast to the predictions made based on molecular modeling studies, all three mutant receptors were able to bind ACh and the structurally related muscarinic agonist, carbachol, with high affinities which differed from the corresponding wild type values by less than 5-fold. However, all three mutations led to dramatic reductions (235-28,300-fold) in binding affinities for certain subclasses of muscarinic antagonists including atropine-like agents and pirenzepine. The m3(Asn507-->Ala) and m3(Asn507-->Asp) mutant receptors were able to mediate carbachol-induced phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis in a fashion similar to that of the wild type receptor. Interestingly, the m3(Asn507-->Ser) mutant receptor displayed about 2-fold increased basal inositol phosphate levels, raising the possibility that it is constitutively active. In conclusion, our data suggest that the asparagine residue present in transmembrane domain VI of all muscarinic receptors is not critical for ACh binding and agonist-induced receptor activation, but plays a key role in the binding of certain subclasses of muscarinic antagonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8034642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  17 in total

Review 1.  Structural organization of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  A L Lomize; I D Pogozheva; H I Mosberg
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Identification by site-directed mutagenesis of residues involved in ligand recognition and activation of the human A3 adenosine receptor.

Authors:  Zhan-Guo Gao; Aishe Chen; Dov Barak; Soo-Kyung Kim; Christa E Müller; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Mutagenesis reveals structure-activity parallels between human A2A adenosine receptors and biogenic amine G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Q Jiang; B X Lee; M Glashofer; A M van Rhee; K A Jacobson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  A structural chemogenomics analysis of aminergic GPCRs: lessons for histamine receptor ligand design.

Authors:  A J Kooistra; S Kuhne; I J P de Esch; R Leurs; C de Graaf
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Muscarinic receptors as model targets and antitargets for structure-based ligand discovery.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Dahlia R Weiss; Mario Rossi; Jianxin Hu; Kelly Hu; Katrin Eitel; Peter Gmeiner; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Identification of orthosteric and allosteric site mutations in M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors that contribute to ligand-selective signaling bias.

Authors:  Karen J Gregory; Nathan E Hall; Andrew B Tobin; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Molecular Architecture of G Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  A Michiel van Rhee; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 4.360

8.  Modelling of the binding site of the human m1 muscarinic receptor: experimental validation and refinement.

Authors:  H Bourdon; S Trumpp-Kallmeyer; H Schreuder; J Hoflack; M Hibert; C G Wermuth
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Roles of threonine 192 and asparagine 382 in agonist and antagonist interactions with M1 muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  X P Huang; P I Nagy; F E Williams; S M Peseckis; W S Messer
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Two types of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in Drosophila and other arthropods.

Authors:  Caitlin Collin; Frank Hauser; Ernesto Gonzalez de Valdivia; Ernesto Gonzalez de Valdivia; Shizhong Li; Julia Reisenberger; Eva M M Carlsen; Zaid Khan; Niels O Hansen; Florian Puhm; Leif Søndergaard; Justyna Niemiec; Magdalena Heninger; Guilin R Ren; Cornelis J P Grimmelikhuijzen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.