Literature DB >> 9258366

Mutagenesis reveals structure-activity parallels between human A2A adenosine receptors and biogenic amine G protein-coupled receptors.

Q Jiang1, B X Lee, M Glashofer, A M van Rhee, K A Jacobson.   

Abstract

Structure-affinity relationships for ligand binding at the human A2A adenosine receptor have been probed using site-directed mutagenesis in the transmembrane helical domains (TMs). The mutant receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells and characterized by binding of the radioligands [3H]CGS21680, [3H]NECA, and [3H]XAC. Three residues, at positions essential for ligand binding in other G protein-coupled receptors, were individually mutated. The residue V(3.32) in the A2A receptor that is homologous to the essential aspartate residue of TM3 in the biogenic amine receptors, i.e., V84(3.32), may be substituted with L (present in the A3 receptor) but not with D (in biogenic amine receptors) or A. H250(6.52), homologous to the critical N507 of rat m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, may be substituted with other aromatic residues or with N but not with A (Kim et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 13987-13997). H278(7.43), homologous to the covalent ligand anchor site in rhodopsin, may not be substituted with either A, K, or N. Both V84L(3.32) and H250N(6.52) mutant receptors were highly variable in their effect on ligand competition depending on the structural class of the ligand. Adenosine-5'-uronamide derivatives were more potent at the H250N(6.52) mutant receptor than at wild type receptors. Xanthines tended to be close in potency (H250N(6.52)) or less potent (V84L(3.32)) than at wild type receptors. The affinity of CGS21680 increased as the pH was lowered to 5.5 in both the wild type and H250N(6.52) mutant receptors. Thus, protonation of H250(6.52) is not involved in this pH dependence. These data are consistent with a molecular model predicting the proximity of bound agonist ligands to TM3, TM5, TM6, and TM7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258366      PMCID: PMC3449164          DOI: 10.1021/jm970084v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  46 in total

1.  Cloning, expression, and characterization of the unique bovine A1 adenosine receptor. Studies on the ligand binding site by site-directed mutagenesis.

Authors:  M E Olah; H Ren; J Ostrowski; K A Jacobson; G L Stiles
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Use of eukaryotic expression technology in the functional analysis of cloned genes.

Authors:  B R Cullen
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the human adenosine A2A receptor. Critical involvement of Glu13 in agonist recognition.

Authors:  A P IJzerman; J K Von Frijtag Drabbe Künzel; J Kim; Q Jiang; K A Jacobson
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1996-08-29       Impact factor: 4.432

4.  Mapping the binding-site crevice of the dopamine D2 receptor by the substituted-cysteine accessibility method.

Authors:  J A Javitch; D Fu; J Chen; A Karlin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Covalent modification of transmembrane span III of the A1 adenosine receptor with an antagonist photoaffinity probe.

Authors:  A P Kennedy; K C Mangum; J Linden; J N Wells
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Agonist derived molecular probes for A2 adenosine receptors.

Authors:  K A Jacobson; L K Pannell; X D Ji; M F Jarvis; M Williams; A J Hutchison; W W Barrington; G L Stiles
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.137

7.  Light-stable rhodopsin. II. An opsin mutant (TRP-265----Phe) and a retinal analog with a nonisomerizable 11-cis configuration form a photostable chromophore.

Authors:  K D Ridge; S Bhattacharya; T A Nakayama; H G Khorana
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the serotonin 5-hydroxytrypamine2 receptor: identification of amino acids necessary for ligand binding and receptor activation.

Authors:  C D Wang; T K Gallaher; J C Shih
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Tetrahydrobenzothiophenone derivatives as a novel class of adenosine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  A M van Rhee; S M Siddiqi; N Melman; D Shi; W L Padgett; J W Daly; K A Jacobson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-01-19       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 10.  Adenosine receptors: pharmacology, structure-activity relationships, and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  K A Jacobson; P J van Galen; M Williams
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1992-02-07       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  24 in total

1.  A neoceptor approach to unraveling microscopic interactions between the human A2A adenosine receptor and its agonists.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jacobson; Michihiro Ohno; Heng T Duong; Soo-Kyung Kim; Susanna Tchilibon; Michal Cesnek; Antonín Holý; Zhan-Guo Gao
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2005-02

2.  Homology modelling of the human adenosine A2B receptor based on X-ray structures of bovine rhodopsin, the beta2-adrenergic receptor and the human adenosine A2A receptor.

Authors:  Farag F Sherbiny; Anke C Schiedel; Astrid Maass; Christa E Müller
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Ligand binding and subtype selectivity of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor: identification and characterization of essential amino acid residues.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Jaakola; J Robert Lane; Judy Y Lin; Vsevolod Katritch; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structure of an agonist-bound human A2A adenosine receptor.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Huixian Wu; Vsevolod Katritch; Gye Won Han; Kenneth A Jacobson; Zhan-Guo Gao; Vadim Cherezov; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Structure-function of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily.

Authors:  Vsevolod Katritch; Vadim Cherezov; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 13.820

6.  A3 Adenosine Receptors: Protective vs. Damaging Effects Identified Using Novel Agonists and Antagonists.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jacobson; Stefano Moro; Yong-Chul Kim; An-Hu Li
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 7.  Ribose modified nucleosides and nucleotides as ligands for purine receptors.

Authors:  K A Jacobson; R G Ravi; E Nandanan; H S Kim; S Moro; Y C Kim; K Lee; D Barak; V E Marquez; X D Ji
Journal:  Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids       Date:  2001 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 1.381

8.  Ligand-dependent activation and deactivation of the human adenosine A(2A) receptor.

Authors:  Jianing Li; Amanda L Jonsson; Thijs Beuming; John C Shelley; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Evaluation of homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors in light of the A(2A) adenosine receptor crystallographic structure.

Authors:  Andrei A Ivanov; Dov Barak; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 10.  The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Daniel M Rosenbaum; Søren G F Rasmussen; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.