Literature DB >> 8032837

Characterization of biofilm and encrustation on ureteric stents in vivo.

P F Keane1, M C Bonner, S R Johnston, A Zafar, S P Gorman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between encrustation and microbial biofilm formation on indwelling ureteric stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ureteric stents from 40 patients were examined for the presence of a microbial biofilm and encrustations. Bacteria in stent biofilms were isolated and identified.
RESULTS: A profuse biofilm (> 10(4) c.f.u. cm-3) was identified on 11 (28%) stents. Enterococcus faecalis was the most common biofilm organism identified and Proteus spp. were not present. Encrustation was seen in 23 (58%) of stents and was not associated with the level of urinary calcium. The major risk factor for stent encrustation was the presence of urolithiasis. Importantly, there was no causative link between stent biofilm formation and encrustation. Both biofilm formation and encrustation increased with the duration of stenting.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that polyurethane is readily encrusted and colonized by bacteria in vivo despite antibiotic prophylaxis. Newer materials must be sought if effective long-term stenting is to be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8032837     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07557.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  23 in total

Review 1.  Encrustation of biomaterials in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Greg L Shaw; Simon K Choong; Christopher Fry
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2004-12-22

2.  Lack of correlation of gelatinase production and biofilm formation in a large collection of Enterococcus faecalis isolates.

Authors:  Jamal A Mohamed; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  [Plasma-deposited carbon coating on urological indwelling catheters: Preventing formation of encrustations and consecutive complications].

Authors:  N Laube; J Bradenahl; A Meissner; J V Rappard; L Kleinen; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Evaluation of a novel gel-based ureteral stent with biofilm-resistant characteristics.

Authors:  Brian M Rosman; Joao A B A Barbosa; Carlo P Passerotti; Marc Cendron; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Comparison of the roll-plate and sonication techniques in the diagnosis of microbial ureteral stent colonisation: results of the first prospective randomised study.

Authors:  G Bonkat; O Braissant; M Rieken; G Müller; R Frei; Andre van der Merwe; F P Siegel; T C Gasser; S Wyler; A Bachmann; A F Widmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Link between culture zeta potential homogeneity and Ebp in Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Muhammad Tariq; Chissa Bruijs; Jan Kok; Bastiaan P Krom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Getting out of a tight spot: an overview of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Niyati Lobo; Sophie Dupré; Arun Sahai; Ramesh Thurairaja; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Presence of five conditioning film proteins are highly associated with early stent encrustation.

Authors:  Benjamin K Canales; LeeAnn Higgins; Todd Markowski; Lorraine Anderson; Qin A Li; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  The high biofilm-encoding Bee locus: a second pilus gene cluster in Enterococcus faecalis?

Authors:  Susanne Schlüter; Charles M A P Franz; Frank Gesellchen; Oliver Bertinetti; Friedrich W Herberg; Friedrich R J Schmidt
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Sequential polyurethane-poly(methylmethacrylate) interpenetrating polymer networks as ureteral biomaterials: mechanical properties and comparative resistance to urinary encrustation.

Authors:  D S Jones; M C Bonner; S P Gorman; M Akay; P F Keane
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.