Literature DB >> 8032674

The relationship between synaptonemal complex length and genome size in four vertebrate classes (Osteicthyes, Reptilia, Aves, Mammalia).

D G Peterson1, S M Stack, J L Healy, B S Donohoe, L K Anderson.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between synaptonemal complex (SC) length and genome size in 18 species of vertebrates from the classes Osteicthyes (bony fish), Reptilia (reptiles), Aves (birds), and Mammalia (mammals). When total SC length was plotted against genome size for all 18 vertebrate species, there did not appear to be a correlation between the two variables. However, when birds were excluded from the data and a linear regression analysis was performed, variation in genome size accounted for approximately 50% of the variation in total SC length (r2 = 0.47). Dividing the average total SC length for a species by its 4C DNA amount yields the species' SC/DNA ratio. SC/DNA ratios of birds were approximately twice as high as the SC/DNA ratios of reptiles and mammals. Bony fish showed intraclass divergence in SC/DNA ratios. The sunfish (Centrarchidae) had SC/DNA ratios almost as high as those of birds, while the remaining fish in the study had SC/DNA ratios similar to those of reptiles and mammals. These observations indicate that inter and intraclass divergence in the relationship between total SC length and genome size has occurred in the vertebrates. Coupled with evidence from the literature, our results also suggest that SC/DNA ratios are positively correlated with crossover frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8032674     DOI: 10.1007/bf01553494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  44 in total

1.  Desoxyribonucleic acid content and cell density in brain and human brain tumors.

Authors:  I H HELLER; K A ELLIOTT
Journal:  Can J Biochem Physiol       Date:  1954-09

2.  A genetic linkage map of the human genome.

Authors:  H Donis-Keller; P Green; C Helms; S Cartinhour; B Weiffenbach; K Stephens; T P Keith; D W Bowden; D R Smith; E S Lander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-10-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary considerations.

Authors:  A H Sparrow; H J Price; A G Underbrink
Journal:  Brookhaven Symp Biol       Date:  1972

4.  Chromosome banding pattern relationships of hares, rabbits, and pikas (order Lagomorpha). A phyletic interpretation.

Authors:  A D Stock
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1976

5.  Chromosome markers in 12 inbred strains of the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus.

Authors:  M Sasaki; Y Kodama; I Hayata; M C Yoshida
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1979

6.  Recombination nodules in the oocytes of the chicken, Gallus domesticus.

Authors:  M I Rahn; A J Solari
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1986

7.  On the evolution of genome size of birds.

Authors:  T R Tiersch; S S Wachtel
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Heterochromatin, synaptonemal complex, and NOR activity in the somatic and germ cells of a male domestic dog, Canis familiaris (Mammalia, Canidae).

Authors:  S Pathak; P Van Tuinen; D E Merry
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1982

9.  Heterochromatin, the synaptonemal complex and crossing over.

Authors:  S M Stack
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  The desoxyribonucleic acid content of animal cells and its evolutionary significance.

Authors:  A E MIRSKY; H RIS
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1951-03-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  17 in total

1.  Asynchronous chromosome pairing in male meiosis of the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  H Scherthan; I Schönborn
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  A test of a counting model for chiasma interference.

Authors:  E J Foss; F W Stahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Nuclear DNA content variation associated with muscle fiber hypertrophic growth in fishes.

Authors:  Ana Gabriela Jimenez; Stephen T Kinsey
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Chromatin condensation in terminally differentiating mouse erythroblasts does not involve special architectural proteins but depends on histone deacetylation.

Authors:  Evgenya Y Popova; Sharon Wald Krauss; Sarah A Short; Gloria Lee; Jonathan Villalobos; Joan Etzell; Mark J Koury; Paul A Ney; Joel Anne Chasis; Sergei A Grigoryev
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  High-resolution crossover maps for each bivalent of Zea mays using recombination nodules.

Authors:  Lorinda K Anderson; Gregory G Doyle; Brian Brigham; Jenna Carter; Kristina D Hooker; Ann Lai; Mindy Rice; Stephen M Stack
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sex-specific differences in the synaptonemal complex in the genus Oreochromis (Cichlidae).

Authors:  Rafael Campos-Ramos; Simon C Harvey; David J Penman
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-08       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Pairing and synapsis in wild type Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Eva López; Mónica Pradillo; Concepción Romero; Juan L Santos; Nieves Cuñado
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization.

Authors:  E A Basheva; C J Bidau; P M Borodin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  MLH1-focus mapping in birds shows equal recombination between sexes and diversity of crossover patterns.

Authors:  P L Calderón; M I Pigozzi
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.620

10.  Reptiles and mammals have differentially retained long conserved noncoding sequences from the amniote ancestor.

Authors:  D E Janes; C Chapus; Y Gondo; D F Clayton; S Sinha; C A Blatti; C L Organ; M K Fujita; C N Balakrishnan; S V Edwards
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.065

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.