Literature DB >> 7768433

A test of a counting model for chiasma interference.

E J Foss1, F W Stahl.   

Abstract

According to the model of FOSS, LANDE, STAHL and STEINBERG, chiasma interference is a reflection of the requirement for crossovers to be separated by an organism-specific number of potential conversion events without associated crossovers. This model predicts that tetrads with close double crossovers should be enriched for conversion events that themselves are not associated with crossing over. We tested this prediction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and found it to be unfulfilled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7768433      PMCID: PMC1206450     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  25 in total

Review 1.  Recombination and meiosis.

Authors:  R Holliday
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1977-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Crossing-over and interference in a multiply marked chromosome arm of Neurospora.

Authors:  D D PERKINS
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF GENE CONVERSION TO CROSSING OVER IN NEUROSPORA.

Authors:  D R Stadler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1959-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A set of cassette cloning vectors for rapid and versatile adaptation of restriction fragments.

Authors:  T Tsang; V Copeland; G T Bowden
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.993

5.  Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae selectable markers in pUC18 polylinkers.

Authors:  J S Jones; L Prakash
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  Statistical analysis of crossover interference using the chi-square model.

Authors:  H Zhao; T P Speed; M S McPeek
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance.

Authors:  E Foss; R Lande; F W Stahl; C M Steinberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The relationship between synaptonemal complex length and genome size in four vertebrate classes (Osteicthyes, Reptilia, Aves, Mammalia).

Authors:  D G Peterson; S M Stack; J L Healy; B S Donohoe; L K Anderson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Minimal size plasmids containing an M13 origin for production of single-strand transducing particles.

Authors:  A Levinson; D Silver; B Seed
Journal:  J Mol Appl Genet       Date:  1984

10.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R S Sikorski; P Hieter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  24 in total

1.  Characterization of human crossover interference.

Authors:  K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Crossover interference in the mouse.

Authors:  Karl W Broman; Lucy B Rowe; Gary A Churchill; Ken Paigen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The recombination landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana F2 populations.

Authors:  P A Salomé; K Bomblies; J Fitz; R A E Laitinen; N Warthmann; L Yant; D Weigel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Statistical analysis of ordered tetrads.

Authors:  H Zhao; T P Speed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L A Gilbertson; F W Stahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes.

Authors:  A Navarro; E Betrán; A Barbadilla; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  New Solutions to Old Problems: Molecular Mechanisms of Meiotic Crossover Control.

Authors:  Gerald R Smith; Mridula Nambiar
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Reduced mismatch repair of heteroduplexes reveals "non"-interfering crossing over in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tony J Getz; Stephen A Banse; Lisa S Young; Allison V Banse; Johanna Swanson; Grace M Wang; Barclay L Browne; Henriette M Foss; Franklin W Stahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me.

Authors:  Luke E Berchowitz; Gregory P Copenhaver
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

Authors:  Franklin W Stahl; Henriette M Foss; Lisa S Young; Rhona H Borts; M F F Abdullah; Gregory P Copenhaver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.