Literature DB >> 8027890

Biomechanical effects of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques.

R E Peter1, R M Harrington, M B Henley, A F Tencer.   

Abstract

This biomechanical study compares two methods of internal fixation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis used in Weber type C malleolar fractures of the ankle. The transverse syndesmotic 3.5-mm screw was compared with two 1.5-mm Kirschner wires introduced obliquely across the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The influence of implants on distal tibiofibular joint motion and contact characteristics of the intact ankle joint were determined. Up to 1.25 mm of lateral displacement and 2 degrees of external rotation of the lateral malleolus during uninjured ankle dorsiflexion was recorded. Both techniques stabilized the injured syndesmotic joint and limited its normal motion during flexion and extension of the ankle. Pressure distribution displaced laterally in internally stabilized ankles compared with intact specimens, regardless of the type of fixation used. Therefore, both techniques alter joint biomechanics equivalently compared with the intact ankle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027890     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199406000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  14 in total

Review 1.  Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines.

Authors:  C Niek van Dijk; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mattia Loppini; Pino Florio; Ludovica Maltese; Mauro Ciuffreda; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Strength of suture-button fixation versus ligament reconstruction in syndesmotic injury: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Hong-Yun Li; Ru-Shou Zhou; Zi-Ying Wu; Yutong Zhao; Shi-Yi Chen; Ying-Hui Hua
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Syndesmosis injuries at the ankle].

Authors:  S Rammelt; E Manke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  A New Intraoperative Syndesmosis Instability Classification System: Utility and Medium-term Results in Closed Displaced Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Qiu; Jun Jiang; Daniel Porter
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Comparative CT Study on Syndesmosis Mobility after Static or Dynamic Fixation for Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Rupture: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ibarzabal-Gil Aitor; Elena Galvez-Sirvent; Jose M Martinez-Diez; Javier Pallares-Sanmartín; Carlos Kalbakdij-Sanchez; Sarah Mills; Juan C Rubio-Suarez; Enrique Gil-Garay; E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-08

Review 8.  Biomechanical Concepts for Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Christine E Schemitsch; Aaron Nauth; Milton Routt; Kenneth A Egol; Gillian E Cook; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Massimo De Filippo; Daniele Casalini; Alberto Longhi; Fabrizio Tacci; Rocco Perotta; Francesco Pagnini; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  A biomechanical comparison study of a modern fibular nail and distal fibular locking plate in AO/OTA 44C2 ankle fractures.

Authors:  Paul J Switaj; Daniel Fuchs; Mohammed Alshouli; Avinash G Patwardhan; Leonard I Voronov; Muturi Muriuki; Robert M Havey; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.