Literature DB >> 26846658

Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines.

C Niek van Dijk1, Umile Giuseppe Longo2, Mattia Loppini3, Pino Florio4, Ludovica Maltese4, Mauro Ciuffreda4, Vincenzo Denaro4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Correct management of syndesmotic injuries is mandatory to avoid scar tissue impingement, chronic instability, heterotopic ossification, or deformity of the ankle. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the current treatments of these injuries to identify the best non-surgical and surgical management for patients with acute isolated syndesmotic injuries.
METHODS: A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed using the following keywords: "ankle injury", "syndesmotic injury", "chronic", "acute", "treatment", "conservative", "non-operative" "operative", "fixation", "osteosynthesis", "screw", "synostosis", "ligamentoplasties" over the years 1962-2015.
RESULTS: The literature search and cross-referencing resulted in a total of 345 references, of which 283 were rejected due to off-topic abstract and/or failure to fulfil the inclusion criteria. After reading the remaining full-text articles, we included four studies, describing non-surgical management, and only two studies investigating surgical management of acute isolated injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: The ESSKA-AFAS consensus panel provided recommendations to improve the management of patients with isolated acute syndesmotic injury in clinical practice. Non-surgical management is recommended for stable ankle lesions and includes: 3-week non-weight bearing, a below-the-knee cast, rest and ice, followed by proprioceptive exercises. Surgery is recommended for unstable lesions. Syndesmotic screw is recommended to achieve a temporary fixation of the mortise. Suture-button device can be considered a viable alternative to a positioning screw. Partial weight bearing is allowed 6 weeks after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute; Internal fixation; Non-surgical management; Surgery; Syndesmotic injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846658     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4017-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  55 in total

1.  Syndesmotic ankle sprains in football: a survey of national football league athletic trainers.

Authors:  M Doughtie
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Aggressive surgical treatment and early return to sports in athletes with grade III syndesmosis sprains.

Authors:  Dean C Taylor; Joachim J Tenuta; John M Uhorchak; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis fixation: a cadaveric, simulated fracture stabilization study comparing bioabsorbable and metallic single screw fixation.

Authors:  Stephen Cox; Debi P Mukherjee; Alan L Ogden; Raymond H Mayuex; Kalia K Sadasivan; James A Albright; William S Pietrzak
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.286

4.  Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation.

Authors:  Annechien Beumer; Martin M Campo; Ruud Niesing; Judd Day; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Bart A Swierstra
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Polyglycolide bioabsorbable screws in the treatment of ankle fractures.

Authors:  W D Hovis; R W Bucholz
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Ankle diastasis without fracture.

Authors:  G S Edwards; J C DeLee
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1984 May-Jun

7.  The bioresorbable syndesmotic screw: application of polymer technology in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Stuart D Miller; Roy J Carls
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-01

8.  Effect of the syndesmotic screw on ankle motion.

Authors:  R L Needleman; D A Skrade; J B Stiehl
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1989-08

Review 9.  Ankle syndesmotic injury.

Authors:  Charalampos Zalavras; David Thordarson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Removal of broken syndesmotic screws: a technical tip.

Authors:  M B Henley; M D Law; S L Henry
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in the diagnosis and management of syndesmotic injury.

Authors:  Matthew L Vopat; Bryan G Vopat; Bart Lubberts; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

2.  Novel anatomical reconstruction of distal tibiofibular ligaments restores syndesmotic biomechanics.

Authors:  Jian Che; Chunbao Li; Zhipeng Gao; Wei Qi; Binping Ji; Yujie Liu; Ming Han Lincoln Liow
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Use of Suture Button in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injuries.

Authors:  Mette Renate Andersen; Wender Figved
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  There is no simple lateral ankle sprain.

Authors:  G M M J Kerkhoffs; J G Kennedy; J D F Calder; J Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The arthroscopic syndesmotic assessment tool can differentiate between stable and unstable ankle syndesmoses.

Authors:  Bart Lubberts; Daniel Guss; Bryan G Vopat; Anne H Johnson; C Niek van Dijk; Hang Lee; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Management of syndesmotic injuries: What is the evidence?

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sven Y Vetter; Nils Beisemann; Benedict Swartman; Paul A Grützner; Jochen Franke
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-11-18

7.  Five-Year Outcomes After Treatment for Acute Instability of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Using a Suture-Button Fixation System.

Authors:  Paul F Förschner; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Buchmann; Georg Feuerriegel; Felix Hofmann; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Pia Jungmann; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-04-27

8.  Comparative CT with stress manoeuvres for diagnosing distal isolated tibiofibular syndesmotic injury in acute ankle sprain: a protocol for an accuracy- test prospective study.

Authors:  João Carlos Rodrigues; Alexandre Leme Godoy Santos; Marcelo Pires Prado; José Felipe Marion Alloza; Renato Amaral Masagão; Laercio Alberto Rosemberg; Durval do Carmo Santos Barros; Adham do Amaral E Castro; Marco Kawamura Demange; Mario Lenza; Mario Ferretti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Sagittal instability with inversion is important to evaluate after syndesmosis injury and repair: a cadaveric robotic study.

Authors:  Neel K Patel; Conor I Murphy; Thomas R Pfeiffer; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Jason P Zlotnicki; Richard E Debski; MaCalus V Hogan; Volker Musahl
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2020-03-30

10.  Is there any change in surgeon's attitude to the management of ankle fractures accompanying syndesmotic injury? A nationwide survey.

Authors:  Halis Atıl Atilla; Alper Öztürk; Yenel Gürkan Bilgetekin; Hakan Aslan; Mehmet Orçun Akkurt; Mutlu Akdoğan
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.