Literature DB >> 8026162

Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).

M T Phelps1, W A Roberts.   

Abstract

Humans (Homo sapiens) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) were tested for memory of upright and inverted primate faces. Working memory was tested in Experiment 1 with a delayed matching-to-sample procedure, and reference memory was examined in Experiment 2 by requiring subjects to learn to discriminate between successive pairs of upright or inverted pictures. Both human and monkey subjects showed better working memory for upright than for inverted human faces and better reference memory for upright than for inverted human and great ape faces. In Experiment 3, reference memory tests with pigeons (Columba livia) showed no effects of inversion on rate of learning with face pictures. We argue that these findings cannot be explained easily by an individual primate's lifetime experiences with primate faces. We suggest that similar evolved mechanisms for primate face recognition in people and monkeys are responsible for the pattern of data reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8026162     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  16 in total

1.  Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Hiroshi Makino
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals.

Authors:  Andrew J Tate; Hanno Fischer; Andrea E Leigh; Keith M Kendrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Pigeons' discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso.

Authors:  S Watanabe; J Sakamoto; M Wakita
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 6.  The evolution of face processing in primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Unoma Akamagwuna
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.